Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump puts 25% tariff on Chinese goods
BBC ^ | 10 Minutes ago

Posted on 06/15/2018 6:08:41 AM PDT by GonzoII

US President Donald Trump has imposed 25% tariffs on $50bn worth of Chinese goods, accusing Beijing of intellectual copyright theft.

The US will impose further tariffs if China retaliates, the White House said.

The tariffs affect more than 800 types of products and are due to come into effect on 6 July.

China has already vowed to retaliate, raising fears of a trade war between the world's two largest economies.

Mr Trump said the tariffs were "essential to preventing further unfair transfers of American technology and intellectual property to China, which will protect American jobs."

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; tarrifs; trmp; trump; trumpasia; trumptrade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 06/15/2018 6:08:41 AM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

I think this is a good move. That being said, here comes price inflation.


2 posted on 06/15/2018 6:13:49 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Haha China! Good luck. It’ll be 200 bln by next Friday.


3 posted on 06/15/2018 6:13:54 AM PDT by mindburglar (I have an above average brain stem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

China cannot afford to lose America as a trade partner, so their ‘retaliation’ will not be much to consider. It is only to save face.


4 posted on 06/15/2018 6:14:20 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

All I can say is the global economy and the flow of merchandise, money and capital is very complex and the dynamics are changing all the time.

I trust the ‘trio’ of President Trump, Peter Navarro, and Wilbur Ross to navigate their way around it.


5 posted on 06/15/2018 6:16:52 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

25% of $50bn is $12.5bn. When compared to a trade deficit of $400bn (3% of the overall deficit)it is only a small dent. But a good start.


6 posted on 06/15/2018 6:17:42 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone
"I trust the ‘trio’ of President Trump, Peter Navarro, and Wilbur Ross to navigate their way around it."

We gotta...

7 posted on 06/15/2018 6:18:35 AM PDT by GonzoII ("If the new crime be, to believe in God, let us all be criminals" -Sheen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

US retailers may try to take a bite by upping prices but China will lower prices to adjust because otherwise they lose market share.

The desired outcome is the PRC government’s profits take a hit, prices in the US remain stable, PRC is poorer; why am I am not having a broken heart for the poor PRC Chinese?


8 posted on 06/15/2018 6:19:37 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
"I keep asking the establishment shills why America has some moral obligation to tolerate foreign countries imposing higher tariffs upon us than we impose upon them. Seems facially unfair, right? So, there’s got to be a really good reason because how can you support our working people facing a higher obstacle to trade than the foreigners do? I’m just wondering what’s wrong with a level playing field. Fair is fair, right? But I never get a good answer."

Link here.

9 posted on 06/15/2018 6:20:46 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

China has 6% of the arable land of the US. They have no oil, no natural gas, no water.

So we have to pay more for transformer toys. Watch how they fold because they have to.


10 posted on 06/15/2018 6:22:49 AM PDT by mindburglar (I have an above average brain stem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

This is bad news, the price of my rat poison filled tooth paste is going to go through the roof


11 posted on 06/15/2018 6:25:45 AM PDT by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
The US will impose further tariffs if China retaliates, the White House said.

If they retaliate? You mean when they retaliate.

12 posted on 06/15/2018 6:27:59 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

“That being said, here comes price inflation.”


Is this truly a given?

It seems given the extremely low production costs in China, they could afford to take a hit on their profit margins and still come out ahead.

Just saying.


13 posted on 06/15/2018 6:51:25 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeWarrior

It seems given the extremely low production costs in China, they could afford to take a hit on their profit margins and still come out ahead.


I believe that is always true to a point. However, 25% is a lot - and it’s already stripped to the bone thanks to huge competition. I expect that prices will go up and quality will go down to compensate.

I think a lot of Chinese companies already save a ton by eliminating post production QA. They try to get the process as reliable as possible and, hey, if it’s defective, you can return it.

25% is big.


14 posted on 06/15/2018 6:54:35 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

I believe they will reduce the wholesale price, but not the full 25%. I think all parties will absorb a part of it, including the consumer. I don’t expect a 25% price increase. Maybe 5% or 10%.


15 posted on 06/15/2018 6:56:23 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman
I think this is a good move. That being said, here come imports from Indonesia, Malaysia, Viet Nam, India ... and maybe some increased USA production.
16 posted on 06/15/2018 6:58:12 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

I think this is a good move. That being said, here come imports from Indonesia, Malaysia, Viet Nam, India ... and maybe some increased USA production.


Yep. I agree.


17 posted on 06/15/2018 7:04:26 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I’m not saying that this is a bad move, but in the end, isn’t it the American consumer that pays that tariff? The result may be that we buy less of the Chinese product, decreasing the trade deficit (this assumes only China makes the product), or we could buy the same amount from China with an increase of domestic inflation, or we could substitute with the product of another foreign manufacturer (e.g. Vietnam) with no effect on the overall trade deficit.

If Trump’s moves result in a more open Chinese market for our goods, great, it will be good for our economy and for domestic jobs. But in the short run, the tariff has been imposed on us.


18 posted on 06/15/2018 7:10:07 AM PDT by PTBAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

The Dollar Store’s now the Buck ‘n Quarter Store.


19 posted on 06/15/2018 7:20:27 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Dang.

If this continues it will soon be cheaper to make things in the US.


20 posted on 06/15/2018 7:41:55 AM PDT by NoLibZone (Mueller, Obama, Hillary and Holder each made millions selling US uranium to Putin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson