Posted on 06/08/2018 7:14:40 PM PDT by bitt
HOW IS THIS LEGAL?
Twitter sent out notices to several investigative reporters and media outlets on Friday including: Wikileaks, Julian Assange, Kim DotCom, Cassandra Fairbanks, Roger Stone, Matt Couch and The Gateway Pundit.
The liberal and Democrat-connected attorneys for Aaron Rich are demanding Twitter turn over all direct messages from these accounts to Aarron Rich’s attorneys.
Aaron is the brother of Seth Rich, the DNC operative who was murdered mysteriously in the summer of 2016. There have been no leads to the murder of Seth Rich. Aaron Rich is suing conservative activists and media outlets for allegedly spreading conspiracy theories about the slain staffer.
On Friday Twitter sent out letters to several conservatives and media outlets including Wikileaks informing the account owners that the attorneys for Aaron Rich are seeking information from the private accounts.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
This is the bullseye question.
Come -on!...we All know Rich leaked the e-mails...the problem is now....can we prove that Trump made him do it!..../s
I’m not getting this could someone explain?
Anyone can be subpoenaed? Hmm... I seem to recall a vague phrase about “probable cause” needing to be demonstrated first.
The explanation you just gave doesn’t make sense.
As with slander, defamationrequires an extremely high burden of proof. The defendant is not presumed to have defaced the plaintiff , absent ffurnishing a preponderance of evidence to compel a judge to allow the case to proceed.
Something ain’t right with this. This brother’s main concern seems to be to punish all those folks who say Rich’s death was an assassination.
Aka deflection
Yeah, it’s strange. Doesn’t add up.
Ok, whatever you say.
Tell you what, i wont tell you how to do your business and you wont tell me how to practice law.
Feel free to disagree on opinion matters but please dont mistake your google search for my law degree.
The article doesn’t do the lawsuit service. Seriously, reading the lawsuit findings it literally is like a 2 year old randomly splattered Cheerio’s on the lawsuit printout and the author chose those words to make their article seem tight.
As it looks, there are several questions given what I’m seeing in it.
1) Did he warn the girlfriend to break up with Seth?
2) Did Seth obtain the DNC E-mails?
3) Did he, in ANY capacity, assist his brother?
If the answer to all three of those is no, then his case may have some grounds, depending on the communications revealed.
If there’s ANY waver to any of those (in other words, if Seth DID take the e-mails) then his case is on thin ice. If the answer to TWO of them is yes, then his case is gone. If it’s 3, then he should have to pay court costs.
Still, to this day, no democrat has been able to explain how a young man, who had serious problems with what was going on where he was working, who noted he was going to the FBI office that morning about Hillary, and was out of his house at an uncharacteristic hour for him, was murdered, none of his personal belongings taken, that we know of, and yet, it had NOTHING to do the DNC and the Clintons.
Something doesn’t pass the smell test. These guys may have taken the “smell test” a bit too far, but SOMETHING is fishy.
What Google search are you referring to? Since I never use Google and don’t form my opinions with the aid of the Internet. My observations are not off the cuff; they are called convictions and have been shaped by six decades of living, breathing and thinking. Feel free to disagree with my views, but don’t make the mistake that you understand their origins. Congrats on being a lawyer; that doesn’t give you an exclusive purchase on truths.
I dont mind taking the time to explain legal issues to non lawyers.
I generally will not waste my time arguing the law with non lawyers. You can argue those matters with others to your hearts content.
Argue with whom you will. My life’s too short to spend more time thinking on it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.