Posted on 06/04/2018 11:21:15 PM PDT by bitt
The US Senate today released over 500 pages of information related to the Spygate scandal.
Hidden in the information are unredacted Strzok – Page texts that show the FBI initiated actions to insert multiple spies in the Trump campaign in December 2015.
Once again Internet sleuths unearthed damning evidence that the FBI was engaged in Spygate long before they let on.
As we reported previously, according to far left Politico, Comey stated in March of 2017 under oath that the FBI investigation into the Trump – Russia scandal started in July 2016:
FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers Monday that his agency has been investigating possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russian officials since last July [2016].
The newly revealed timeline — which Comey detailed in a much-anticipated House Intelligence Committee hearing — means the FBI probe was occurring during the peak of an alleged Russian campaign to destabilize the presidential race and eventually help elect President Donald Trump.
But Comey appears to have lied about this.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Yet, what were the objectives of the Hussein conspiracy? Were they not exactly the opposite of the adversaries listed above, in that the cable wasn't pursuing extra-territorial control, but rather were wholly focused on subverting the electoral process and representation of the United States sovereign aka We the People?
In that case, doesn't the coup attempt not only rise to the level of an act of war, but also represents the greatest national security threat this country has ever experienced, one that came dangerously close to overturning the legitimate, constituted government?
Lastly, we should all note that the winner not only writes the history, but also dictates the terms. Why should we be bound to a case brought forth over 200 years ago as some kind of binding precedent? If the attempt was a coup, and the coup was an act of war, then levying, aiding and comforting are all acts of treason.
..The only way out of this mess for them is if the public gets tired of the whole thing,..
that’s why we need non partisan professional law enforcement agents and prosecutors to do the job whether it is popular or not
War is between two adversaries and not an internal affair, this includes the Civil War. It was an insurrection.
I don’t think Trump vs the World as a war would fly, though it is precisely that.
“...I put forth the argument that an attempted coup is in actuality an act of war. In other words, treason: levying, aiding and providing comfort to the enemy, regardless if foreign or domestic. “
Spot on. A coup is an act of war. The left are at war with America and the Constitution.(domestic enemies)
Corrupting and politicizing much of our ‘administrative’ state and courts into an enemy of the people...There is no higher form of treason.
“Trust Trump. F Sessions. “
lol...Tagline material
“I don’t think that Sessions is an active participant in the coup”
I do. It maybe under duress but he knows damn well the consequences of his actions.
Look, you're a good poster, so there's no reason for any of these threads to escalate, especially when we're all in basic agreement.
However, that being said, I don't believe your definition is correct, especially about "war not being an internal affair". If that were true, then how come the Spanish civil war is called just that, a war. If you're not familiar with what occurred, it's actually pretty interesting. The tl/dr version is the military attempted a coup against the duly elected republican (communist) government. They failed in capturing/turning Barcelona and the north, but controlled the south. So the failed coup degraded to a knock out, drag out fight for territorial control until Madrid/Barcelona capitulated to Franco's troops. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Civil_War)
Using your definition, it was not only was the civil war not a war, but the coup wasn't an act of war either. I think reasonable people can conclude that this is demonstrably wrong. A coup d etat is most definitely an act of war, in that it is a highly leveraged attempt at executing a revolution by merely decapitating leadership.
But this all just parlor room debating; the bottom line is the winner gets to dictate how history is written. If patriots prevail, then this was an attempted coup, therefore an act of war, ergo actions undertaken in levying, aiding and providing comfort all rise to the level of treason. Trump, tribunals and We the People will determine the terms - if it be treason, and Sessions, RR et al have any sense of self-preservation, then they are either highly confident fvcks, deranged lunatics hoping for a hail mary, or hopelessly lost in denial of the severity of the situation.
I neglected to add that if it be treason, then why, for the first time in history, should events pan out any differently than they always have when a defense of state security is mounted? To reference back to the Spanish (not a) Civil War, the retribution and retaliation taken against both sides was by any measure extraordinary. Entire villages and towns wiped out, thousands of priests & nuns rounded up and executed.
For the Hussein treason to be somehow swept under the rug, and everyone goes back to back-slapping each other after work at the local water hole seems pretty far fetched.
And as we speak the IG report is being slow-walked and according to the President, possible edited...The Deep-State will not go down easy.
Before the election, a group of Corporate Globalist and the Big-wigs of both parties met on an island off the coast of Virginia., together they conspired to take down Trump. I would bet a million, Sessions was among that group.
Was a list of those attending ever publicized?
Is this neocon globalist and Saudi pal, James Baker?
Any hope we can Steele indicted? Would love to see that happen.
It doesn’t look like Sessions attended.
Why isn't that vile piece of human trash in prison yet?
* Didn't feel like the "please" made sense in the context of a threat.
Welcome aboard! Extra points for creative writing!
What possible reason could there be for redacting the word "lures," other than to engage in a coverup?
I suspect this IG report is a test to see if further redactions such as "oconus lures" occur. If I'm correct, and this happens, we might see a shutdown, or at least a major round-up, at the FBI and DOJ.
The logic is simple. If the FBI and DOJ are covering up crimes, they cannot continue pretending they are crime-fighting organizations (at best). At worst, they are criminal conspirators in crimes up to and including TREASON.
So, after 500 days of trying to restore the integrity of those two outfits, their duties might need to be handed off to another group with more integrity, and a higher commitment to serving the USA and its people.
Who might be ready to take on that task? Some have suggested that "This is war". I agree that this is war against We The People and against the US Constitution.
Does the Constitution have a provision for "insurrections"?
Not as far as I know.
So, after 500 days of trying to restore the integrity of those two outfits, their duties might need to be handed off to another group with more integrity, and a higher commitment to serving the USA and its people.
But I do know the President of these United States is also the Commander in Chief of her armed forces.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.