Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative

Nuclear is the future.


3 posted on 06/01/2018 1:15:03 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Eddie01

It is desirable to have an energy mix.The old ‘don’t put all your eggs in one basket’ philosophy. Coal plants, and especially nuclear plants traditionally produce a greater amount of watts.
It is not so much the number of plants but the percentage of the nation’s power each source provides.
Building new plants from planning to going ‘on line’ take a considerable length of time.
Better not to be caught short in the event electric is needed.


20 posted on 06/01/2018 2:43:33 PM PDT by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01
Nuclear is the future.

Why coddle the RATs? They hate it, they should get what they ask for; the RAT-cities need to go dark.

There are other (not necessarily new) nuclear technologies that need to be developed and implemented; thorium reactors, re-constituted fuel rods etc. Otherwise, we don't need another freaking Fukishima.

44 posted on 06/05/2018 5:30:28 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (The Obama is about to hit the fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

I agree

What I wonder is why there s not cevelopment of small nuclear generating plants rather than the very large regulation damaged large plants.

I worked many years off and on on the constrution of large nuclear plants and witnessed the destruction by a thousand cuts.


47 posted on 06/05/2018 5:44:18 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson