Posted on 05/30/2018 9:24:06 PM PDT by DeweyCA
“It means there’s basically an ability to boycott gay marriages”, as if that’s a bad thing. Shouldn’t free people be able to boycott whatever they like, without government forcing them to buy something they don’t want, or do something they don’t want to do?
The liberal judges are trying to find a way to curtail free speech without admitting that’s what they’re doing.. If they give Phillips a pass ,then everyone involved with weddings can turn gays down...Liberals are trying to figure a way to stop it ..They hate free speech for anyone but them...
The great lie of our age is the King’s new clothes, the idea that homosexuality is normal, irreversible and must not only be accepted by the masses but approved of as well.
being gay is an abominable deviant lifestyle choice that flies in the face of Christian morals- it is NOT a genetic issue that can’t be helped- it is a choice- period! Others should not be forced to cater to it or accept it and celebrate it or help celebrate it, any more so than a satanist should not be able to demand a Christian bakery bake a cake with satanic elements listed on it- We have a religious right in this country to object to abhorrent lifestyle choices of groups of people who choose to live lives that are morally reprehensible and offensive. Should Christian bakeries be forced to bake cakes that celebrate the sick twisted world of pedophilia? Of course not! Of Bestiality? Nope! Necrophilia? Not a chance! To celebrate child sacrifices to Molech? No Way! ALL these are abhorrent lifestyle CHOICES- homosexuality is no different- it is a choice- and forcing someone against their religious beliefs to support it or create stuff to celebrate it, or ANY of the other numerous abhorrent lifestyles people CHOOSE to live- is not constitutional!
No Kennedy is worth anything.
It is worse than a “choice”. It is caused by childhood neglect and abuse always. Anyone who celebrates such vile, evil behaviors is also celebrating child abuse.
Moberly’s book on Psychogenesis and also all the research in the Catholic Church details the cause of “homosexuality”—a made up Marxist “word” for sodomites like in Afghanistan where they have boy harems....just like the Spartan and Samurai did, since it is essential to corrupt little boys for the grooming into that vile, evil lifestyle—like Milo was “groomed....and Chastity Bono, and Harry Hay, and Harvey Milk and Oscar Wilde, and as all the “homosexuals” who end up raping 108 boys on average. It is why Cardinal Pell’s trial in Australia (the boy-sex ring—like the Franklin-Cover Up) is so secret. It is why no one knows about the little boys that John Maynard Keynes was passing around in his homosexual orgies-—and he is venerated—a pederast—as is Harvey Milk—a pederast—in our evil public skools which is normalizing the satanic behaviors in five year olds with “Pride” in sodomizing others days.
Truth will set us free. The Truth is that sodomy is an abomination and learned behavior—as all behavior is learned and habituated..... and if always includes the grooming of little boys so they are warped for life.
Sodomy is anti-christian, anti-science, anti-human, anti-reason, yet they promote the satanism (and islamic/Kabbala) behaviors-—which is promoting Ba’al “Rites”-—a religion on our kindergarteners and bakers and photographers. There is NO freedom of thought or religion in such a vile Vice System-—which promotes evil behaviors and considers people who desire to sodomize others as “good” and it is “love”-—such a vile 2000 year-old flipping of Good and Evil back to the slave-pederastic days of Greece again.
“No Kennedy is worth anything.”
We should hope that this one “moves on,” one way or another. Retirement, or a pine box. At this juncture either is fine with me.
It should do no such thing as boycotting gay marriages, that's an asinine argument. Would gays still be able to be married? Of course they would! Instead of the queers and their panderers starting their own businesses catering to their desires they demand that others........especially Christians celebrate their perversity.
“Homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.” - Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2357
And so fine, you’ve virtue-signaled your great virtue and condemned it even worse than the bible does (if it were possible) but that still leaves the question:
What do we DO about this thing.
God must, must, MUST be in the answer. We aren’t dealing with earthly powers alone here. Did this even have to be kicked up to the USSC now — why couldn’t support for the victim have been crowdfunded? Could this have waited for another Trump appointment? Oh well, it hasn’t.
The liberals are in a dilemma here though. If they win on this one, that could bring in a stiff wind to the right, which could cost them much more than Trump already has. And Trump will do it with a hey nonny nonny.
The goal has always been to destroy marriage. Gays don’t really want it, they want to pervert it into something unholy, forcing Christians to watch and approve so as to make the destruction a total one. To them, that’s a step toward destroying the concept of God itself. Then, down can be up, bad can be good, and depravity can be virtue.
Well it looks like the sleight of hand is pretty advanced here... though I hope even the USSC decides not to play with double fire after playing with single fire.
Any cases with Muslim run Bakeries refusing to serve Gays on the Docket, or is this just the usual Christian persecution?
One of the targets of leftists is to destroy traditional marriage. One of the paths to that goal is to force everyone to accept other types of marriage. Their arguements are really just highly intellectual nonsense. Gods arguements for traditional marriage, and against sexual perversions, are easy for anyone to understand, and they never change.
Ah, the prosecutors drop those like hot halal potatoes.
We have a question for churches here however. Suppose the government just won’t stand up for what you ought to stand up for. Now what do you do. George Washington won’t do it for you anymore.
All businesses, large and small, make decisions on who to buy their products from based on sometimes arbitrary criteria such as convenience, personality of the jobber, advertising, etc. In a sense, businesses discriminate when dealing with other businesses.
But, since the enactment of the Civil Rights act of 1964, it is illegal to discriminate when selling goods and services to the public. You can pick your suppliers but not your customers.
Carried to its logical conclusion, which it could be, the law would prohibit exclusive purchasing channels in certain specialty goods and services. (These are probably intended to reduce outside competition more than anything else, of course, with no implication of racial, age or gender discrimination. Credit rating, net worth, sales volume, number of stores or employees would be factors, though, and not everyone qualifies.)
The freedom to contract, once thought inviolate, has been eroded bit by bit over the last century. Government permission is required to do business, and once granted it must be done only in accord with ever-changing laws and regulations.
It's all for our safety and well-being, of course.
‘elf and safety, like they say in unjolly old England.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.