Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: morphing libertarian

“IT’S THE LAW.”

And my contention is that the law is unconstitutional because it violates my freedom to associate with whom I desire.

And I only need five of nine Supreme Court justices to agree with me in order to vacate that law.


61 posted on 05/25/2018 4:57:07 PM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: MeganC

good luck, let me know how that works for you.

Housing and food are a stronger case than baking cakes.


62 posted on 05/25/2018 4:58:51 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Build Kate's Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: MeganC
And my contention is that the law is unconstitutional because it violates my freedom to associate with whom I desire.

There are any number of Supreme Court decisions that say otherwise.

87 posted on 05/26/2018 5:47:39 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson