"We are currently unable to locate them." in 3....2.....
1 posted on
05/24/2018 11:00:03 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
2 posted on
05/24/2018 11:00:36 AM PDT by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
I guess the US Senate isn’t aware of the phrase “have them to me by close of business today”.
4 posted on
05/24/2018 11:05:15 AM PDT by
bigbob
(Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
To: rktman
no later than June 6, 2018 This drives me crazy.
Let's look at this the other way around -- there is a sensitive document which can't be safely shared with the world. Parts need to be redacted. Well, that will take some time. We need to contact experts, they need to make decisions and come to agreement. Final version of a redacted document may be a few weeks away -- maybe we get it to you by June 6 2018.
But that's not the case here at all
Here the request is just for the raw document. Okay. Push the button. WHOOSH! There goes the email. It took 5 seconds and now you have the raw unredacted emails. So, what is up with this June 6 nonsense?
To: rktman
6 posted on
05/24/2018 11:05:46 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
To: rktman
Weasel will agree, provided the letters with an “a,m,b,and o”, may still be redacted.
7 posted on
05/24/2018 11:06:14 AM PDT by
blackdog
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...
8 posted on
05/24/2018 11:08:38 AM PDT by
bitt
(t\\)
To: rktman
Note to all future POTUS, regardless of party: Fire all top echelons of the Justice Dept, FBI etc on Day 1 of your administration. Deep six the deep state.
9 posted on
05/24/2018 11:09:08 AM PDT by
Theophilus
(Repent)
To: rktman
Everything just seems like a slow walk to the midterms.
Also, I feel like I’m seeing more bark than bite from Congress.
10 posted on
05/24/2018 11:09:23 AM PDT by
And2TheRepublic
(People like freedom of speech, but only when it's sweet to their ears.)
To: rktman
1. ALL redactions must be INITIALED/ATTRIBUTED by the FIRST person to make the redaction decision.
2. ALL redactions must be footnoted with a number corresponding to the REASON for the redaction.
ANY redaction made for purposes of CONCEALING A CRIME by the DOJ, FBI or any other agency will result in PROSECUTION FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE of the person who made the redaction!!!
11 posted on
05/24/2018 11:11:38 AM PDT by
CivilWarBrewing
(Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
To: rktman
“Please provide unredacted copies of all text messages” between FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page “to the Committee no later than June 6, 2018.”
Why not all text messages OF Peter Strzok and ALL text messages OF Lisa Page? I would bet they didn’t just communicate this stuff with each other.
13 posted on
05/24/2018 11:13:59 AM PDT by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(Wisdom and education are different things. Don't confuse them.)
To: rktman
Rosenstein is RUNNING OUT THE CLOCK, Hillary style..
PROSECUTE ROSENSTEIN FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. ENOUGH ALREADY!
18 posted on
05/24/2018 11:38:47 AM PDT by
CivilWarBrewing
(Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
To: rktman
20 posted on
05/24/2018 11:44:25 AM PDT by
Iron Munro
(If Illegals Voted Republican 66 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall !")
To: rktman
I bet one of the texts says, “ We should leak that we are lovers to explain all these texts between us.”
21 posted on
05/24/2018 12:04:06 PM PDT by
joshua c
(To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives)
To: rktman
Did anyone vote Rosenstein into office? Because he thinks he was elected king.
23 posted on
05/24/2018 1:29:21 PM PDT by
eccentric
(a.k.a. baldwidow)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
