Posted on 05/19/2018 9:54:31 AM PDT by MNDude
What It Is: The “Hollywood EGF Facial”, otherwise known as the “Penis Facial” thanks to stars like Sandra Bullock and Cate Blanchett, who both swear by it for radiant, glowy skin
Who Tried It: Jillian Ruffo, Associate Beauty Editor
Why We Tried It: Let me ask you this: Would you pass up the chance to have skin that looks as smooth as Blanchett or Bullock’s? (We didn’t think so.)
Level of Difficulty: 2, if you factor in very mild pain and upkeep
It all started back in March, when Blanchett opened up about her skincare secret: a special facial at esthetician Georgia Louise‘s New York City skincare atelier, which Bullock turned her on to. She called it the “Penis Facial” — which, after further investigation, we learned got its name from the treatment’s ingredients. And on Thursday’s episode of The Ellen DeGeneres Show, Bullock explained not only why the treatment is so good, but also the reason behind the name.
Bullock explains that through a microneedling technique, the facial boosts collagen by enabling serums, including an epidermal growth factor (or EGF) serum to seep deeper into the skin. The serum, she tells DeGeneres, is “an extraction from a piece of skin that came from a young person far, far away.” But as DeGeneres bluntly points out, the EGF is derived from “foreskin from a Korean baby.”
(Excerpt) Read more at people.com ...
Bris Cartel
What a group of putz.
again what the hell are you talking about ‘fake news’? I asked a question- Asking a question isn’t ‘fake news’ for crying out loud- Not sure what the hell you’re going on about?
you’;re accusing me of fake news for asking a rhetorical question? Lol- talk about digging to the depths of hell for something to argue about-
Now that was really SICK.
(but made me laugh)
[[A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question that is asked to make a point rather than to elicit an answer.[1] Though a rhetorical question does not require a direct answer, in many cases it may be intended to start a discussion or at least draw an acknowledgement that the listener understands the intended message.]]
Exactly- not sure what is so hard to understand about that? There was no ‘fake news’ involved in asking a rhetorical question- Again=- still unclear what you are going on about ‘fake news’ for- it was a question- one that we all KNEW the answer to (hence the term rhetorical question- get it?)not a news item for crying out loud
Gentiles in America are 99 percent circumcised too
What’s odd is Koreans are not
So someone is paying to have it done
“There was no ‘fake news’ involved in asking a rhetorical question”
Dude, you put it out as fact, which is is not. That is fake news. How hard is that to understand.
[[Dude, you put it out as fact, which is is not]]WOW- no i did NOT- it was a rhetorical question- obviously you don’t understand what rhetorical questions are even though you linked to the very definition- I did NOT state it as fact or even as news— it was a simple question- what don’t YOU understand about that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.