Re: Cali's System, it's not a "jungle primary" like Louisiana and I technically misspoke when I called the November elections "runoffs".
In the Bayou the all-party "jungle primary" which is is on election day, if someone gets 50% + 1 they win, if not the top two advance to a Dec runoff. Municipal elections in Chicago are the same system.
In Cali (and also now WA State) the all-party primary is held in June and the top two in each race advance to the November general election regardless of whether a candidate get's over 50% or not (as they often do), all general election races have 2 candidates (unless the incumbent was unopposed I guess, none were for any major race).
Cali's old system the "blanket" primary, ruled unconstitutional in 2000 (after ALL the parties sued), was similar, you could cross vote, vote for a D in one race and R in another, but the top finisher in EACH party advanced to the general. So if a primary result was say
Rat A 51%
Rat B 30%
GOP A 18%
Green A 1%
Rat A would have faced GOP A AND Green A in November and Rat B would be out. I prefer CLOSED primaries but I wouldn't mind that system so much in Illinois (or Cali or any dem leaning state).
If we could run Dems that were True Moderates and
Gop voters would vote for them, then it would work
Neither condition is met