Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Strange Endorsement
Townhall.com ^ | May 19, 2018 | Arthur Shaper

Posted on 05/19/2018 7:06:32 AM PDT by Kaslin

A brief direct message on Twitter gave me the grave news I feared the most: President Trump endorsed John Cox, a Chicago-born businessman who carpet-bagged to California five years ago, for Governor of California.

I am stunned, and it made me sick to my stomach. Full disclosure: I support Assemblyman Travis Allen for governor, the candidate who has been outspoken about his support for Trump and his agenda from the beginning.

But the bigger issue comes to the following questions:

  1. Why would Trump support Cox instead of Allen?
  2. Who is giving advice to the President? Did he make this decision himself?
  3. How does this affect California Politics? What about National politics?

The first question stems from a basic fact about John Cox: He didn’t vote for Trump in the 2016 primary nor the general election. Having voted for Ted Cruz and then Gary Johnson (who was as libertarian as Hillary Clinton is principled), Cox has struggled since then to engage with conservatives throughout the state. He has recently admitted regret for not voting for Trump, but that’s not enough for the base. Cox has a Big Money establishment veneer about him, too Romney-esque, and many conservative activists have confided to me that they don’t trust him. California doesn’t need another big money outsider who will get pushed around by Deep State Sacramento interests in the state capitol. Look at Illinois RINO Governor Bruce Rauner to confirm these suspicions.

Cox isn’t a shining conservative by any means, either. He opposes the death penalty. He has gone on record during debates that he supports Agenda 21 style constructions, including high density housing. Yes, the California housing crisis has reached unsustainable proportions, but the problem is government overregulation and corporate cronyism, not just a mere lack of housing.

Cox has received a few endorsements from pro-life groups, but then has falsely charged that his rival is pro-choice with a dismal record on defending life. After reviewing five years of Planned Murderhood records on this issue, anyone can see that Allen received a 0% rating from the baby-killing organization for three years, then received a failing grade and a 60% rating for two years because of legislation supported by PP, but which had nothing to do with abortion in the first place.

Cox has stood on different sides of the immigration issue, too. On Spanish-language media, he has dismissed the idea of a border wall, then he favored it as his conservative rival picked up steam in the primary. Recently, he shied away from emphasizing the wall in an interview with the San Diego Union-Tribune. Cox is running to be competitive in the general election, in that he wants to find a comfortable spot for conservative voters to like him enough, and then he can appeal to independents and moderate Democrats in the general election.

In sharp, stark contrast, Assemblyman Travis Allen is charismatic, approachable, exciting. He lights up a room with stump speeches that stress every issue that Californians care about. He is strong, strong, strong on illegal immigration. He wants the wall, he wants illegal aliens deported, and he has not shied away from slamming Democratic rivals Gavin Newsom (former mayor of San Francisco) and Antonio Villaraigosa (former mayor of Los Angeles) for promoting sanctuary city policies and endangering American citizens. Allen stood his ground without hesitation or reservation on illegal immigration, socialized medicine, high taxes and fees in the midst of the extravagantly left-wing, biased Telemundo-sponsored town hall. Did I forget to mention that he is an outspoken Trump supporter keen on California’s maintaining a strong relationship with the White House?

So, why would Trump support Establishment-leaning John Cox? One clear reason is that Cox has more money, mostly his own. He has attracted heat from Democratic and independent PACs, which signals that a candidate is gaining in the polls. Former House Speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich endorsed John Cox a few months earlier, too.

Trump’s decision is not helping, though, as far as one can tell, but no one should doubt President Trump’s motives. He cares about California and has praised the state’s conservative grassroots groups major successes to stop the Sanctuary State law. This past week, he sat down with elected officials—legislators, county sheriffs and mayors—to talk about the growing unrest and outrage against California’s unpopular, dangerous, and unconstitutional sanctuary policies.

Surely the President knows that California’s open primary system has endangered California Republicans, nearly 24,000 registered voters away from third party status behind Democrats and Decline to State voters. The Top Two means any top two, and that could be two Democrats, as happened with the US Senate race in 2016. Surely Trump knows that California has turned into a fundamental battleground for national Republicans in their efforts to hold onto the House of Representatives. No doubt Trump is thinking about Washington DC, and he wants to hold onto both chambers of Congress, filled with more MAGA candidates. There needs to be a Republican contender at the top of the ticket in California for the November election.

Yet I doubt the wisdom of this move. Cox will trumpet for the next two weeks that the President endorsed him instead of the candidate who has not stopped endorsing Trump and his agenda. This is the California version of Luther Strange, in which Trump goes with the Establishment candidate because of bad advice. Cox is not a strong draw for many Republican voters. He is not charismatic, and with all his money, he couldn’t purchase enough delegates at the CAGOP convention to win the state party endorsement! Hillary Clinton outspent Trump nearly two-to-one, yet we all know how the election ended.

Perhaps we grassroots conservatives need to reconcile the fact that once again Trumpism, conservative populism with an edge toward helping working Americans and stopping globalist, establishment policies, will Trump the Donald once again. Let’s hope that this national-statewide divide doesn’t hurt our state and our national chances going into November.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2018endorsements; 2018midterms; ca2018; johncox; presidenttrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2018 7:06:33 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would think Cox and Allen will be defeated in weak third or fourth placed finishes.


2 posted on 05/19/2018 7:12:29 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Reconcile that no Republican will be elected governor in CA.


3 posted on 05/19/2018 7:12:52 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“...a Chicago-born businessman who carpet-bagged to California five years ago, for Governor of California”..........

So what’s the big deal? A Chicago born female, the “Pant’s Suit Hag” carpet-bagged to New York and ran for president.


4 posted on 05/19/2018 7:14:44 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Could it be that Trump picked the most liberal Republican specifically because he had the best chance of winning and turning back the political dictatorship the Democrats have established in California?


5 posted on 05/19/2018 7:14:56 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Maybe he can’t see an overwhelming number of Democrats or Republicans turning out to elect a decent conservative in a state like California.

Maybe he thinks he knows how to handle someone like this RINO.

Actually, both are likely to be true. RINOs are stupid and easily malleable based on external pressures.

6 posted on 05/19/2018 7:15:53 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

There will most likely be a “choice” between two far-Left candidates for governor in California’s rigged election system.


7 posted on 05/19/2018 7:16:39 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Strong national security, immigration, language, employment, and benefits policies could have saved California if they had been implemented three decades ago.


8 posted on 05/19/2018 7:19:00 AM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I live in California and the clear choice is Cox vs. Allen.

Allen’s deceit is becoming legendary. When asked to support the movement against Gov. Brown’s gasoline tax...he refused.

Cox was all in from day 1.

Now in ads, Allen says he was not only for the repeal, but led the charge.

Neither are perfect, but Allen is a clear POS.


9 posted on 05/19/2018 7:21:00 AM PDT by Herodes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Swamp vs Not Swamp?

It’s California, which is a goner anyway.


10 posted on 05/19/2018 7:22:07 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Hmmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywise
Could it be that Trump picked the most liberal Republican specifically because he had the best chance of winning and turning back the political dictatorship the Democrats have established in California?

Electing RINOs to support Rat policies is in no meaningful sense "turning back the political dictatorship the Democrats have established in California."

11 posted on 05/19/2018 7:29:55 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In CA, any statewide R is a throwaway candidate anyway.


12 posted on 05/19/2018 7:55:17 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What difference does it make who Trump endorses?
CA is gone for good, even for RINO candidates.


13 posted on 05/19/2018 7:58:31 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small fee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree; Skywise
Electing RINOs to support Rat policies is in no meaningful sense "turning back the political dictatorship the Democrats have established in California."

We tried that with Schwarzenegger, and it didn't work.

14 posted on 05/19/2018 8:05:57 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We need to not pay attention to California and save our ammo for November.

Gavin will be the next Governor regardless....


15 posted on 05/19/2018 8:15:19 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I just saw an anti-Cox ad on TV. It was paid for by supporters of Villaraigosa.


16 posted on 05/19/2018 9:34:59 AM PDT by JoeRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeRed

Newsome is running ads against Cox as well...no mention of this guy Allen anywhere.


17 posted on 05/19/2018 9:49:37 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Herodes

Townhall is Salem Radio who locally support Allen. So now their house organ Townhall features some dirtbag writer no one has ever heard of writing a column talking trash about a guy they dont support. Salem Radio needs to be bankrupted


18 posted on 05/19/2018 9:58:57 AM PDT by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Skywise; scrabblehack; TheRightGuy; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; ...

Cox ain’t no liberal. I don’t know a ton about Allen but I’d have guessed Cox was to his right. Cox was the most conservative of the candidates when he ran for Senate from IL in 2002.

I didn’t know Cox was a never Trumper though.

Weird.

Allen certainly seems to be a stronger candidate.

One of them needs to drop out to have a decent chance of making the runoff.


19 posted on 05/19/2018 11:21:21 PM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
CA is gone for good, even for RINO candidates.

Defeatist bovine scatology... Just like the entire "Solid South" was a Democrat stronghold where Republicans had no chance.

Just like West Virginia was a union owned Democrat stronghold

Just like Wisconsin was the center of "Progressivism" and Republicans had no chance.

Politics is dynamic, not static. We should not surrender a single inch of territory. Fight for conservative constitutional principles across every single elected office in the 50 states, D.C., and the five territories.

Beat a Democrat with a RINO, then beat the RINO with a conservative. Leftists play the long game, always pushing, they have been after single payer socialized medicine for over 100 years. We need to focus on the long term, and stop stupid squabbles that let leftists like Clinton '92 and Obama win.

20 posted on 05/19/2018 11:24:43 PM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson