Gina Haspel Refuses To Answer Rand Paul's Questions About CIA Involvement In Steele Dossier

Gateway Pundit ^ | May 18, 2018 | Cassandra Fairbanks

[Proud White Trump Supporter]

Full title reads:

EXCLUSIVE: Gina Haspel Refuses to Answer Senator Rand Paul’s Questions About CIA Involvement in Steele Dossier

Prior to her confirmation as CIA Director, Gina Haspel was facing tough questions from Senator Rand Paul, and The Gateway Pundit has exclusively reviewed her responses which completely dodged specific questions about the CIA’s involvement with the Christopher Steele dossier.

[Proud White Trump Supporter]

She worked directly under Brennan. Is it possible she didn't answer Rand's questions because there's an ongoing investigation in progress.

[JudyinCanada]

That’s the first thing I thought.

I may have missed it, but did the president respond to the Nunes et al request that he tell the DOJ to give them the information they sought?

[rktman]

She could tell him but then-------sanctioned. 👹

[Proud White Trump Supporter]

I’m not sure!

[Iron Munro]

You can’t clean THE SWAMP out with the same people who built it, nurtured it, protect it and protect each other.

[Dalberg-Acton]

Rand should waterboard her to get the answer! :)

[SubMareener]

Gina was the Station Chief in London during the period in question. She knows where the bodies are buried. Jury is still out on Rand Paul.

[bkopto]

It’s usually “sources and methods” and/or “national security”, “safety of human resources”. You know, the usual excuses.

[Proud White Trump Supporter]

Lol

[Michael.SF.]

Correct.

I don't trust her.

[tennmountainman]

I will give her the benefit of doubt for now.
If she was part of this criminal activity, she
will be exposed. If not, I hope she does a great job.

[tinamina]

Oh no. (Sinking feeling.)

[Mr. Jeeves]

Drives me crazy that FR leaped en masse to uncritically support her nomination. Paul's questions were right on target.

[Kipp]

Drives me crazy that FR leaped en masse to uncritically support her nomination. Paul's questions were right on target.

I agree. I don't think Haspel should be disqualified because of the waterboarding history. But I've been suspicious that she's a swamp creature. Her avoidance of Paul's questions only heightens that suspicion.

[Kipp]

Drives me crazy that FR leaped en masse to uncritically support her nomination. Paul's questions were right on target.

I agree. I don't think Haspel should be disqualified because of the waterboarding history. But I've been suspicious that she's a swamp creature. Her avoidance of Paul's questions only heightens that suspicion.

[Lopeover]

Kansas probably got the lay of the land when he was in the C_A. Figured out the white hats from the black hats.

[SMGFan]

And Paul voted against her.

[MayflowerMadam]

“Paul’s questions were right on target.”

Yes. Logical questions considering where she worked and who she worked for.

I hope she isn’t a mistake.

[Alberta's Child]

She should be disqualified simply because she worked in the second Bush administration. I assume that baboon’s retardation was contagious.

[Michael.SF.]

'en masse' ?

Not so sure on that.

I think uniting behind her by many was more due to the hypocrisy of the left: condemning her while embracing Brennan, for example.