p
Unless it recommends a convening a grand jury, this nothing but expensive toilet paper..
Generally I find that the longer something is the less it says.
Yep, in an extremely long and thorough way, the report scorches James Comey for unfairly detailing Hillary’s conduct after he had already concluded that she committed no crime.
And further, in an extremely long and thorough way, the report scorches James Comey for announcing on the eve of the election that the FBI had discovered a huge new trove of Hillary’s State Dept emails on Anthony Weiner’s unsecure laptop, when he just should have kept that to himself so as not to affect her chances of winning the election.
Coated the entire thing with whitewash.
Two coats
Sean Hannity said on his radio show today that the DOJ and the FBI will be given the opportunity to redact portions of the IG report.
Sean said if this is true, he will be upset and it’s just more of the same.
“there is an expectation that there will be at least one referral for prosecution
“The report is expected to focus solely on the Clinton investigation and not on the 2016 Russia election meddling investigation.”
As for the criminal referrals, it would be similar to the outcome of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe... who was fired after Horowitzs explosive first report. Horowitz also submitted a criminal referral on McCabe to the DOJ for possible criminal prosecution. It would be up to Washington prosecutors to determine whether or not to move forward”
“The Clinton report is expected to be followed by a third report on the IGs investigation into the FBI and DOJs handling of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application on Carter Page”
So much for the vaunted IG's report, and so much for 'Sessions, the silent assassin'.
This process has been f***ing kabuki theater from the very start.
Unless he recommends PRISON for HIlliary etal, it will be a FARCE!!
If the IG doesn’t produce the Report soon, the Movie will be out and no one will care about the Report.
Turned over to current and FORMER officials? What does that mean and why would a former official get the report? Like maybe Comey?
The draft, however, does not include any recommendations for criminal prosecution.
So, why go through all the motions?
And yet the subject of the investigation remains unscathed?
This report is either speculation or the OIG is leaking too. I suspect this is unsourced speculation.