[Electric Graffiti]

And there’s a law stating that a crime needs to be established before appointing a special counsel, yet here we are...

Take everything mueller and the corrupt state say with a pillar of salt. The rule of law is DEAD—This is a COUP.

[Cementjungle]

This helps the Dems. The new narrative: “Despite the overwhelming evidence of Trump’s collusion, this arcane rule protects him from being indicted”

[CatOwner]

B.S. They will indict Trump on something. The DEMs and the Deep State are going to ramp up this summer and fall, keeping Trump from helping the GOP in November.

Hey Trump, you horse's a$$. Get someone in DOJ to clean up this garbage.

[Ann Archy]

There was NOTHING to INDICT!!!!!!! NOTHING!!

[Eleutheria5]

Why, this violates the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment! If a bunch of Russians can be indicted, General Flynn can be indicted, and Paul Manafort can be indicted, why can’t President Trump! What? Because the Constitution gives him immunity from indictment? The Constitution is unconstitutional! Besides, he doesn’t deserve the protection of the Constitution because he stole the election by colluding with Russia! What? Just because there’s no evidence? How did that stop the aforementioned hereinbefore recited indictments? The charges are so series that the presumption of innocence should not apply! The blue wave is coming to free us all from freedom! BWAHAHAHAHA!

Mrs. Clinton, it’s time for your afternoon medication. Hold out your arm.

[StAnDeliver]

A toothless rat (an "acting" toothless rat) showing disdain for someone else's toothless edict. Too rich!

Neal Katyal, acting solicitor general in the administration of former President Barack Obama — the administration's top courtroom lawyer — wrote the current special counsel regulations as a young lawyer in Clinton's Justice Department in 1999. They specify that a special counsel "shall comply" with the policies of the Justice Department, for whom Mueller works.

Katyal said on MSNBC's "The Beat With Ari Melber" in February that means that Mueller is bound by the 2000 Justice Department memo but that he "can seek exceptions."

"This old opinion from 20 years ago does preclude, in general, the Justice Department from indicting a sitting president for constitutional reasons," Katyal said. "But an exception can be given."

[StAnDeliver]

"Reportedly" allegedly theoretically lofl

Has anyone every witnessed this supposed knowledge? Not even a FISA warrant could procure proof that Nadler knows anything but his way to the bottom of a pig trough...

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), a reported constitutional scholar, has taken his place in the chance that there’s a showdown between Congress and the White House.

[Karliner]

Never tire of all the winning.

[enumerated]

Indicting Trump was never an option - what matters is public perception regarding Trump/Russia collusion. Either the perception is that Trump is guilty, or that he’s not. Mueller’s no-indictment statement is a backhanded way of publicly stating that he considers Trump to be guilty.

I believe there is some good news here, though. Up until now, Trump has had to make a show of tolerating, even accommodating the investigation. Any pushback would be seen as obstruction and would fan the flames.

By making this statement, Mueller has shown his cards and created an opening for Trump to make his case without appearing ‘defensive’ or ‘obstructionist’.

Trump is probably holding a bunch of aces. Think of it - the general public may not know it, but we know, and Trump certainly knows that the entire Russia/Trump collusion case is a frame-up launched months prior to the 2016 election from within the various politically weaponized agencies of the Obama administration.

The idea was to tarnish Trump and assure a Clinton victory at all costs. Confident that Clinton would win and as POTUS would cover up their tracks, and reward them for services rendered, they broke hundreds of laws and left their fingerprints everywhere.

When Trump won, the Obama deep state found themselves way out on a limb. Their only play was to double down on the Russia collusion frame-up, pinning their hopes on a quick impeachment and removal. To keep Trump’s hands tied, they stood ready to charge him with obstruction of he were to so much as lift a finger to defend himself.

But Trump played it very cool and has apparently weathered the storm. Meanwhile, there are hundreds of deep state players complicit in the frame up and cover up, who are guilty of planting evidence, illegal spying, witness tampering and much, much more. They have no Madam President to protect them or reward them for services rendered. Trump has had over a year to quietly put the squeeze on these people - flip them.

The good news is that it will only take one public confession/indictment of a high level conspirator to blow this whole thing up. Out of probably hundreds of co-conspirators, only one needs to be proven guilty of framing candidate Trump for colluding with the Russians.

Because if even one agent is proven guilty of the frame up, then that proves the frame up happened. If the frame up happened, then the Russia/Trump collusion didn’t happen. At that point, the deep state frame up narrative unravels, dominos fall, and public perception swings in Trump’s favor.

Trump has been the victim of the most corrupt abuse of power in the history of the nation, and the truth will out. The American people are not going to like it one bit.

[StAnDeliver]

"Now, it was the neo-red scare, a Russophobia that was both unhinged and unwarranted. Democrats now considered any contact with a Russian an act of treason. If you had Stoli vodka, it was treason. It was totally insane, but also insanely entertaining."

Almost as entertaining as this thread!

[BeauBo]

(Satire Alert!)

WASHINGTON, D.C. - After discovering no evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election, and after accidentally uncovering evidence incriminating the Clinton campaign, FBI Director Robert Mueller directed his attention to Ukraine.

Ukraine ignoring Mueller's demands for fabricated dossiers is "…in my mind the strongest evidence yet" of Trump-Ukrainian collusion to influence the last election, according to Mueller.

With the Ukrainians stonewalling and the Russian well having run dry, Mueller has turned his attention to possible ties between the Trump Campaign and the Ottoman Empire.

"I am leaving no stone unturned," said Mueller at a press conference this afternoon. "We know there was collusion because it's widely reported in the media. If it wasn't Russia, and if it isn't Ukraine, then it has to be somebody. Today I have issued a subpoena to Grand Sultan Mehmed VI to testify before a grand jury about what he knew and when he knew it."

(from The People's Cube: http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/mueller-ottoman-empire-probe-may-show-evidence-of-collusion-t20109.html)

[ExTxMarine]

This was NEVER about indicting President Trump; this was about creating as much political discourse and making Trump’s administration seem as “scandal-ridden” as possible.

PERIOD! NOTHING ELSE!

[entropy12]

Why? Just because one was elected by 62 Million voters and the other was appointed by Rod Rosenweasel, does not mean the elected dude can’t be indicted. /S

[GOPJ]

How could the politically tone deaf Hillary lose?

How could a woman with no charisma, economic agenda, or political skill lose?

How could a woman who wrote off half the country as deplorable racists lose?

You know the answer to this, but for liberals it had to be the Russians.

Hey Morning Joe and your silly sycophants... read this - open your eyes... it's not too late to join the sane folks...