Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hojczyk

IT has been a possibility since day one....


2 posted on 05/15/2018 10:13:18 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hojczyk

I read this yesterday and thought this certainly Makes sense. I understand another search is being done.


5 posted on 05/15/2018 10:20:04 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
I don’t think this is a “new” theory. I agree it was an obvious possibility from the start.
23 posted on 05/16/2018 5:34:54 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

It’s highly unlikely that he would have planned on attempting a soft water landing because his planning was too meticulous. He would have known that, best case, ditching with the plane intact would have left him adrift at sea in an airplane full of dead bodies. Worst case, it would have broken up on landing, probably leading to a torturous death (for him) by drowning.

Knowing the fuel slick would have been a marker buoy to the crash site, he’d have flown it until it was low on fuel, then firewalled the throttles and nosed it over to put the air speed indicator on the barber pole until impact.


26 posted on 05/16/2018 11:30:54 AM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson