Skip to comments.
C-SPAN After Words: Jerome Corsi on "Killing the Deep State"
C-SPAN ^
| 5/12/2018
Posted on 05/12/2018 8:45:11 PM PDT by iowamark
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161 next last
To: Fantasywriter
Threaten all you want to, if you enjoy issuing threats.Burning you on a thread is hardly a threat...it's an action.
Hot enough for you yet?
61
posted on
05/13/2018 8:39:43 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Fantasywriter
The questions are 100% legitimate. They are the logical/rational product of the preceding discussion.
Repeating your assertion doesn't change anything.
What you were attempting to do is plain to see.
62
posted on
05/13/2018 8:41:37 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
Telling me I’ve been warned twice isn’t burning me. It’s just threatening.
63
posted on
05/13/2018 8:41:55 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: philman_36
That goes both ways. You can impugn my motives all day but in the end you’re still 100% wrong.
64
posted on
05/13/2018 8:43:10 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
So in your opinion killing a book that exposes the Deep State’s illegal attempt to destroy Trump is a good thing?OMG! philman_36 thinks killing the book and keeping the Deep State hidden is a good thing! (implication disguised as a question, IMO)
It hurts the Deep State?
OMG! philman_36 thinks not hurting the Deep State is a good thing. philman_36 is a bad man. (insinuation disguised as a question, IMO)
Do not project false motives onto me.
But it's okay for you to do it to others.
65
posted on
05/13/2018 8:49:45 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: iowamark
66
posted on
05/13/2018 8:49:59 AM PDT
by
EliRoom8
To: Fantasywriter
You can impugn my motives all day but in the end you’re still 100% wrong.
You can impugn my character all day but in the end you’re still 100% wrong.
67
posted on
05/13/2018 8:54:11 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Fantasywriter
So in your opinion killing a book that exposes the Deep State’s illegal attempt to destroy Trump is a good thing? It hurts the Deep State?Where have I even implied such things? Be specific.
68
posted on
05/13/2018 8:58:59 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
If a book exposing and documenting the Deep State’s illegal anti-Trump activities is suppressed that is helpful to the Deep State.
69
posted on
05/13/2018 9:01:10 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: philman_36
The issue is the two warnings you issued me, no more and no less.
70
posted on
05/13/2018 9:02:21 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: philman_36
Learn the difference between a question and a statement.
71
posted on
05/13/2018 9:06:34 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
Again...Where have I even
implied such things? Be specific.
Or have you not gotten there yet?
Learn the difference between a question and a statement.
You've gone from being rude to being asinine.
72
posted on
05/13/2018 9:09:38 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
If we agree on post 69 there is no issue.
73
posted on
05/13/2018 9:12:13 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: philman_36
You highlighted the fact that I asked you for your opinion. Asking a person’s opinion is entirely different from making a statement about a person’s opinion.
74
posted on
05/13/2018 9:13:40 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
If we agree on post 69 there is no issue.post 69...If a book exposing and documenting the Deep State’s illegal anti-Trump activities is suppressed that is helpful to the Deep State.
Have I implied anywhere that suppressing such a book is a bad thing? Having problems with that one?
What you said earlier...
The issue is the two warnings you issued me, no more and no less.
So...what is the issue?
75
posted on
05/13/2018 9:20:40 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Fantasywriter
Asking a person’s opinion is entirely different from making a statement about a person’s opinion.
Your subterfuge has already been exposed.
Remember, you wanted to go there, not me.
76
posted on
05/13/2018 9:22:25 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
Post 46:
Me: ‘If a book exposing the Deep State’s illegal anti-Trump machinations sells well it hurts the DS [and helps Trump]. If it fizzles the DS benefits.’
You: ‘Pure speculation on your part.’
I then asked your opinion. That’s not a federal crime.
77
posted on
05/13/2018 9:27:09 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: philman_36
You said I’d been warned twice. I said if you enjoy threatening people that’s your affair.
78
posted on
05/13/2018 9:28:56 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: philman_36
philman,
Did you bother to watch any of the C-Span interview with Sheryl Atkinson? Just because we know that some of this occurred doesn’t mean we stop gathering/gleaning further details. Atkinson has a great reputation, better than Corsi’s, and her reaction to the info is quite interesting.
79
posted on
05/13/2018 9:38:59 AM PDT
by
EliRoom8
To: Fantasywriter
Post 46:...You better back up a bit...
Reply 44 was in reply to Reply 43.
Reply 46 - If a book exposing the Deep State’s illegal anti-Trump machinations sells well it hurts the DS [and helps Trump]. If it fizzles the DS benefits.
Pure speculation on your part.
Which your statement is. You mention nothing about the great reporting going on by others and you place all emphasis on the Corsi book as if it is the be all/end all when it isn't.
Corsi is riding the coat tails of others to the bank...AGAIN!
Do you grok it yet?
80
posted on
05/13/2018 9:44:51 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson