Skip to comments.
C-SPAN After Words: Jerome Corsi on "Killing the Deep State"
C-SPAN ^
| 5/12/2018
Posted on 05/12/2018 8:45:11 PM PDT by iowamark
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161 next last
To: corlorde
Honestly, I HATE when someone links me to a video. I have so little time to watch stuff I like, let alone sit and watch a twenty minute local access video some guy slapped together to explain something.
Its it takes more than 1 page, (30 seconds in script writing) then you are not communicating it well. And these guys dont communicate well.
To: philman_36
If the book is not killed by negative publicity it certainly has the potential to reach people who are unaware of the coup attempt. Right here on FR—hardly a hotbed of LIVs—some are still debating whether Rosenstein and Mueller are white hats or black hats. Knowledge of the coup is hardly universal.
42
posted on
05/13/2018 7:33:18 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
But who else has written a book about the ongoing attempt to overturn the last election?As if the number of books written on the issue means a damn thing?!
Who gives a flying f**k how many books have been written?!
I want my info
real time, not months/years after the fact.
Whose best interests would be served if that book dies on the vine?
Obviously not in Corsi's interest! This book of his isn't going to make him much money 'cause anybody interested in the subject can read all about it on the Internet!!
43
posted on
05/13/2018 7:34:19 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
If a book exposing the Deep State’s illegal anti-Trump machinations sells well it hurts the DS [and helps Trump]. If it fizzles the DS benefits.
44
posted on
05/13/2018 7:38:27 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
Please! Spare me.
If people aren't already interested they never will be. Some will
always choose to ignore the obvious which is right before their eyes.
"We don't want to take your guns. That's just right wing paranoia."
Knowledge of the coup is hardly universal.
Knowledge of the Swift Boat issue wasn't universal either and after all this time many are still ignorant, notwithstanding books written on the issue.
Wasted argument, IMO.
45
posted on
05/13/2018 7:41:27 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Fantasywriter
If a book exposing the Deep States illegal anti-Trump machinations sells well it hurts the DS [and helps Trump]. If it fizzles the DS benefits.Pure speculation on your part.
46
posted on
05/13/2018 7:42:45 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
So in your opinion killing a book that exposes the Deep State’s illegal attempt to destroy Trump is a good thing? It hurts the Deep State?
47
posted on
05/13/2018 7:47:43 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
So in your opinion killing a book that exposes the Deep States illegal attempt to destroy Trump is a good thing? It hurts the Deep State?
Now you're just being rude.
48
posted on
05/13/2018 7:55:00 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
I asked two very logical and rational questions. How is that being rude?
49
posted on
05/13/2018 8:01:21 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
I asked two very logical and rational questions.
No you didn't. You made an implication and an insinuation disguised as questions!
Don't go there.
You've been warned twice now! Don't burn your bridges.
50
posted on
05/13/2018 8:06:26 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
My questions were polite and honest. What’s the next step? Getting me banned?
51
posted on
05/13/2018 8:11:09 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
52
posted on
05/13/2018 8:15:11 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Fantasywriter
Whats the next step? Getting me banned?
I have no power to get you banned so I have no idea why you would even posit such a notion.
53
posted on
05/13/2018 8:18:05 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
You said I had been warned twice. So I inquired about the next step.
54
posted on
05/13/2018 8:21:27 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
55
posted on
05/13/2018 8:24:00 AM PDT
by
Freee-dame
(Best election ever!)
To: philman_36
Do not project false motives onto me. The questions were/are genuine, honest and polite. They follow rationally and logically from the preceeding discussion.
56
posted on
05/13/2018 8:24:41 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter; corlorde
The warning was to prevent you from getting burned.
You've already shown that
corlorde didn't know
what he was talking about and you might very well be next.
THAT was the warning I was trying to give you.
So, please, go there if you so choose.
More deception will only damage you.
57
posted on
05/13/2018 8:27:52 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Fantasywriter
Do not project false motives onto me.Like you tried to do with me with your BS 'questions'?The questions were/are genuine, honest and polite.
Yeah, you just keep on telling yourself that.
58
posted on
05/13/2018 8:32:14 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
Threaten all you want to, if you enjoy issuing threats.
59
posted on
05/13/2018 8:36:55 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: philman_36
The questions are 100% legitimate. They are the logical/rational product of the preceding discussion.
60
posted on
05/13/2018 8:38:37 AM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson