Trump on Eric Schneiderman in 2013 tweet: ‘Wait and see, worse than Spitzer or Weiner’.
Making sense of it???? Why???
That’s like the joke about two policemen at the scene of a woman’s brutal beat down. She has broken ribs, smashed face, bodily bruises.
One cop looks at the other and says, “I wonder what she said to deserve that?”
Why is it called the "Pound Me Too" Movement?
No clicks for Mona Charen.
...Making Sense of Eric Schneiderman...
Who cares? Really?
As the story unfolds about creepo Schneiderman, we learn:
<><> businessman Trump (then a Democrat) was the go-to guy for Dems wanting campaign contributions:
<><>the money-hungry beggars squeal bigtime on their opponents, other pols, (their own sex lives), to get bigger donations.
<><> S/derman hit Donald up and got $12,500, a nice piece of change; musta been pretty good squealing.
ITEM-—Trump has tweeted S/derman squealed damaging stuff about Obama, Cuomo, maybe Chuckie, maybe other Dems.
BOOM This explains why creepozoid S/derman filed 100 lawsuits against Donald. The craven creepo used Third World tactics to intimidate Donald. The lowlife S/derman like some tinpot dictator, employed the machinery of govt to prevent Donald from exposing S/derman’s stupidity in spilling damaging info about high-ranking Dems.
Trump on Eric Schneiderman in 2013 tweet: ‘Wait and see, worse than Spitzer or Weiner’.
Men espouse feminism to get laid.
VOTE DEMOCRAT 2018
o You Brown Slave !
o Call me Master !
o As I slap you !
— This message brought to you
by Democrat Eric Schneiderman
Hmm. All the male abusers of women are men ...
Cuomo jumped on his back with the knife out, why so soon you rat bastard!
“Samantha Bee’s defiant conclusion is: “You know who’s a better advocate for women? Women. ... The future really is female, or at least it better be, because I am done with this.” Katha Pollitt’s resolve is similar: “I have no answers. But here’s what I’m going to do: Vote for women. Support women. Protect women. Believe women.””
I take that as a DECLARATION OF WAR on men, even more so that already exists. So now there is NOTHING that men can do, in the eyes of feminists, to have credibility with them (because of a relative handful of male liberal beasts), so they will NEVER support any man.
So, now we know, MEN AND WOMEN are different and perhaps it’s time that OUR SIDE accept that fact too. Sure there are/were some decent female leaders, but virtually all of them succumb to FEMINIST instincts at some point or another - being a Texan, I still remember Kay Baily Huchison siding with the military-hating Left, rather than the military, in the Tailhook scandal. She was ROCK-SOLID conservative prior to that, and then slowly after Tailhook she went further and further left, until she thankfully retired. Sandra O’Connor in the Supreme Court started out fairly conservative, but was pretty damn left at the end.
So it’s time we accept that fact, and consider it when voting between two people who otherwise appear equal - when it’s a man versus a woman...because we now know, FOR SURE, that the women will be doing just the same on their side.
“...The Huffington Post consulted a psychologist to help explain how it was possible that “male allies” could become “abusers.” Katha Pollitt, who once flippantly warned, “Never trust a male feminist,” ...”
=> Great, get yourself three cats, two crock pots and ballroom dancing lessons....we don’t need feminists breeding.
He is a democrat,a BS artist