Posted on 05/08/2018 3:05:43 AM PDT by a little elbow grease
Barry had more than one SS number when he was in college.. if i recall, one was from the east coast...a place he never lived. His birth certificate.. the one he produced.. had discrepancies on it.
If he was born in the US. He was not American..he was a foreigner anti American.
Your information is incorrect. The audit requirements at the CIA are just as stringent. There is no one who just gets to peruse data without a trail. The Security Technical requirements on any TS database systems are insanely complex and very thorough. Trust me—I’ve worked on similar DoD systems for years.
Now accessing data is dependent upon permissions, and there are some with “god” access, but even “god” is tracked. Not a byte is unaccounted.
If you think him capable of a fraction of what you described, I’ve got a nice bridge to sell you. Not to say all the plans aren’t true, just that Barry couldn’t plan his way out of a dime bag. He was and is the figurehead of the globalist cabal. Look to the lizard for the real power. She’s always been the handler.
I will defer to you on this, and will see if I can find the article that discussed in detail the difference between the two.
Rope...invest in rope futures. That may be the only way.
You’re right....Obama had a Social Security Number that was issued in Connecticut. Obama never lived in the Nutmeg State. WTF?
The longer this continues, the deeper the mud, the more I am forced to the conclusion that the deep state players are in absolute control. All the folderol about 4D chess is so much bravado. Trump is compromised completely. Nothing else makes any sense.
Really it come down to the fact that 90% of people are completely ignorant when it comes to technology. All and I mean ALL the excuses for “lost” data is complete bs. Redundancy is one of the primary reasons for “the cloud.”
Give any patriotic SA or DBA the ball, and I guarantee in 80+% of the cases they’d have the files, and for the rest they’d give you the name of the perpetrators who deleted anything. (In a few hours—not days or weeks either!)
The difference is in control. Transferring files to a CIA site means eliminates NSA control. It doesn’t matter if it’s cloud or on premise. The authority is now the CIA. When the CIA lies to Congress; it’s a mutual agreement. Neither one wants the truth; they just want some good tv, or they may want you to get very, very bored. State and CIA are acting against the President and country’s interest and have been since I’ve been alive. Many in Congress share the same world view and run cover for all of them. Anyone who thinks you can tell the players by (R) or (D) is seriously naive.
What’s interesting from my perspective is that what people worry about is administrative control. That’s where everyone agrees who in charge and how things are done procedurally. With the CIA, the means they all agree to the same story.
What such control doesn’t address is technical control. That is where the skeletons are buried. That is where the real information lies, but no one every walks down the hall to see what is happpening in those cold hallways filled with whirring fans and flashing lights. Those flashing liights that indicate another backup, another mirror, another file sever or storage array just received the last batch of encrypted, serialized data that is destined to be archived in accordance with the contract.
well worth reading again, for those who recall this piece. and best to presume British Intel provided the info:
13 April 2017: Guardian: British spies were first to spot Trump team’s links with Russia
Exclusive: GCHQ is said to have alerted US agencies after becoming aware of contacts in 2015
by Luke Harding, Stephanie Kirchgaessner and Nick Hopkins
GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said...
The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.
Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors...
According to one account, GCHQ’s then head, Robert Hannigan, passed material in summer 2016 to the CIA chief, John Brennan. The matter was deemed so sensitive it was handled at “director level”. After an initially slow start, Brennan used GCHQ information and intelligence from other partners to launch a major inter-agency investigation...
One person familiar with the matter said Brennan did not reveal sources but made reference to the fact that America’s intelligence allies had provided information. Trump subsequently learned of GCHQ’s role, the person said...
One source suggested the official investigation was making progress. “They now have specific concrete and corroborative evidence of collusion,” the source said. “This is between people in the Trump campaign and agents of [Russian] influence relating to the use of hacked material.”
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia
also worth noting how Hannigan, who resigned for “personal reasons” on 23 Jan 2017, took part in Aspen event with Adm Mike Rogers and WaPo’s David Ignatius in July 2017.
not dated, but stated elsewhere as being on 22 July 2017:
London Speaker Bureau: Former GCHQ’s Director Robert Hannigan – ‘accomplishing mission impossible’
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) was recently interviewed alongside Mike Rogers, Director of the National Security Agency by David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post at the Aspen Security Forum...
VIDEO - 1 HOUR 6 MINUTES
https://londonspeakerbureau.com/gchq-robert-hannigan-aspen-security/
I sure wish a real news agency, with deep pockets and plenty of resources would take an interest in this.
CTH is doing great work here. But, very few Americans know who they are, and even fewer trust anything they say.
He being capable isn’t the subject.
He’s as evil for our country as anyone can be and still be voted for the office he held. The voters believed him..
He was as bad as king saul was but the people wanted to vote for the charisma of
A black President. He got the position and the elite set him up and let him do whatever he wanted to.. nothing good.
Evil has a way of doing things that seem impossible.. in his own ability
He was more than willing to be in the midst and enjoy the accolades he received. He is convinced he is God’s gift to us. He used everything at his disposal to take us down and there was nothing he didnt try. He’s still at it.
Because he was half black.
No one on the left or media criticised him. They were afraid to..it was his protection and he went as far as it took him. And it changed our country..divided us.
hmmmmm,
contractors allowed in [4]
phones allowed in
these people are stupid
Nothing will ever be done about them.
Anyone who walks in and thinks they have VIP clearances and can browse the NSA data listing without being tracked through each data request...is fooling themselves. The FBI may be as stupid as they act in public....but not the NSA folks. There’s probably an entire listing of these requests....who the target was....and who was logged on. Rosenstein has to be worried because all of this will lead back to the Obama White House.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
yup. imo, it’s all cover for barrack hussein bin soetoro at the white mosque.
bttt
No one on the left or media criticised him. They were afraid to..it was his protection and he went as far as it took him. And it changed our country..divided us.
—
That’s true, but I think it happened before that. The first I noticed it was during the Bush / Gore debacle in Florida. It’s that moment that the left decided they would pull out all the stops and show their real face. Blank ballots being found in election officials cars. Locking Republicans out of rooms where the counting was taking place. Re-count and re-count and re-count until you “find” the votes to win . . . just pulling out all the stops.
Hopefully, they’ll lose just as much this time as they did then.
Right...on...the...money.
Is it possible the disparity between the two databases has something more to do with the “unmasking” and less to do with auditing?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.