Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

RE: Why is this a “stunning” figure? The population not in the labor force includes tens of millions of retirees.

We really should not be counting retirees. I’d like to know if they have a statistic that filters those who are retired out of the picture. THAT will give us a true indicator of those who are actively looking for work and not finding it ( i.e., how dire or how good the job market is ).


14 posted on 05/07/2018 8:31:19 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind
The Social Security Administration might be a good source for some data that might be a good indicator even if it's not a totally precise count of retirees.

There were about 32 million people collecting Social Security retirement benefits in 2000, and about 45 million in 2017. There's 13 million new retirees right there, and that doesn't even include the people over the age of 62 who are eligible to collect SS but elect not to start yet.

16 posted on 05/07/2018 8:40:55 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson