Someone please correct me, but I thought the Special Counsel law REQUIRES any changes to the assignment to be in writing.
go read the transcript
there is no “law”
amazing
Transcript: Oral Argument EDVA US vs. Manafort (motion challenging the Special Counsel)
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3652929/posts
...I thought the Special Counsel law REQUIRES any changes to the assignment to be in writing...
Constitutional due Process requires that authority to conduct an “investigation,” (with big quotation marks,) such as this be spelled out in writing so the rules can’t be changed as things move forward.
You just can’t make up the rules as you go along. Apparently this is exactly what is happening. Police power of the DOJ as being used by the Deputy AG is being abused.
“... I thought the Special Counsel law REQUIRES any changes to the assignment to be in writing.”
I only read parts of the redacted document, but even the unredacted part stated that anything not specified in the charge required the Special Counsel to go back to get his oder revised, if memory serves.
Wouldn’t you love it if it’s Mueller who ends up in deep doo ???
It requires all sorts of things that Mueller & Co. are ignoring, such as conflicts of interest compelling (as in not optional) them to resign.
LOL, that's so cute. You think that Liberals follow laws when they are wresting power and control for themselves? Laws are only for the weak, in their minds.