Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brace Yourselves: Democrats Could Totally Self-Destruct If Trump Wins A Nobel Peace Prize(T)
townhall.com ^ | 4/30/2018 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 04/30/2018 7:23:00 AM PDT by rktman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: rktman
Here’s a man that many on the Left hoped would bring war and misery to the world.
41 posted on 04/30/2018 8:45:05 AM PDT by arthurus (v^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

They gave Obama one for doing nothing... no way in hell they will give one to Trump no matter what he does.


42 posted on 04/30/2018 8:45:53 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

it just didn’t elude Bush and 0bama, but Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush the 1st, and Clinton.

Trump could, in 1.5 years, achieve what none of the others were able to achieve in 65 years.


43 posted on 04/30/2018 8:56:25 AM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

America First!

We don’t need any foreign peace prize. We should create an American peace prize which would only be awarded to Americans.


44 posted on 04/30/2018 9:06:35 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The liberals are already down-playing President Trumps role. They are saying that Kim is coming to the table ONLY because his test site imploded. If so, Kim, no dummy, sees that as a great way to save face and start talking. The fact that the president took a hard line to begin with will be lost in the background noise.


45 posted on 04/30/2018 9:19:02 AM PDT by Oatka (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Who says he wants it? What an insult. That is no prize. Especially after the Kenyan got one for doing nothing.


46 posted on 04/30/2018 9:23:05 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oatka
The liberals are already down-playing President Trumps role.

What would anyone expect for a pack of deceitful liars? Remember, Trump is not serious, he will never get the nomination and he will never be elected president.

Trump is turning around the entire country, not to mention dragging American foreign policy back to where it actually benefits America and Americans. Thanks to Trump, the leftist are losing their asses.

47 posted on 04/30/2018 9:31:14 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Don't worry the political elite that gave the peace prize to Obama, Arafat, Bill Clinton and others would never give it to Trump. They would give it to Kim of North Korea as a snub to Trump.
48 posted on 04/30/2018 9:42:03 AM PDT by Robert357 ( Dan Rather was discharged as "medically unfit" on May 11, 1954.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Wanna have some fun? Ask your neo-communist buddy what he’d do IF Trump won the NPP?

Don’t stand too close.
Wear a raincoat.


49 posted on 04/30/2018 10:07:04 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

I suspect that, just to be sure, the DNC has dispatched people to lobby the Nobel Committee to reject Trump. Their argument: If he gets a Nobel, we might not be able to impeach him.


50 posted on 04/30/2018 10:20:54 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

——I think there’s some Cruzers here that don’t want to see Trump get the Nobel.-——

Dude, give it a rest...it’s been 18 months.

Why would even the most ardent Cruz supporters not want to see Trump win a NB prize?


51 posted on 04/30/2018 10:31:50 AM PDT by Popman (Wisdom is not what you know about the world but how well you know God. 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The Nobel prize committee would never give President Trump the Nobel Peace Prize. Think about it - they gave Obama a peace prize just for not being George W. Bush. They are waaaaaaaay to political to give one to President Trump.

They might give it to Kim Jong Un and Moon Jae-in, though.


52 posted on 04/30/2018 10:48:37 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

You think Trudeau is a shoe in also?? He has all the glitz and glam of a retarded puffer fish.


53 posted on 04/30/2018 11:08:12 AM PDT by Karliner (Jeremiah29:11,Romans8:28 Isa 17, Damascus has fallen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Exactly.


54 posted on 04/30/2018 11:50:22 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rktman

There should be a 30 day moratorium n liberal speech


55 posted on 04/30/2018 11:52:38 AM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Build Kate's Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I think I’ll trust the NORKs ... what could possibly go wrong? /s

Incidentally, I’ve said it before and I will say it again: I would NOT be surprised to learn that Kim has been playing a part in a drama that was prearranged with Clinton and the ChiComs on the basis that she was going to be the next POTUS.

Follow me for a moment:

The Clintons and ChiComs are old collusion buddies going back to Bill’s time in office and that includes pay for play.

Hillary’s health isn’t great and she logically might not have had much time to cement the reputation of Clinton greatness, meanwhile her VP is relatively young, scandal free and could, if Hillary didn’t last out her term, be a reliable swamp creature to head the party up for year to come.

A great success by Hillary could head off the Clintonistas losing control of the party to Obama entirely.

On he flip side, just to mention, recall Obama saying he wasn’t going away? It would have taken much longer than just the election for him to move his people into place which means he was doing so when it was assumed that Hillary would win. He wasn’t going to just surrender all his power even to a Democrat.

So, here’s the thought: what might Clinton have been willing to give up to the ChiComs for a diplomatic win in Korea? The South China Sea around that artificial island or something more? Plus some loot of course, can’t forget the payola.

As for Kim, NK has been sputtering along for years and the end of the war is possibly the guarantee his family’s dynasty. He’d have everything to gain by going along, or by going forward even if the Clinton-ChiCom axis of the deal fell apart.


56 posted on 05/01/2018 12:06:22 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Who knew a Weiner could ever get a Clinton in trouble while we’re at it?

Of course we aren’t talking with Democrats, those wagons circle themselves.


57 posted on 05/01/2018 12:08:17 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman

bump


58 posted on 05/26/2018 10:36:02 AM PDT by GOPJ (Code name/WiretapFever/NationalSecurityLetters/Unmasking/Changing rules/MSM strategy/Leaks-Attkisson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
I’d venture he does not win.

The two Korean heads of state win, Trump is omitted. That’d be my guess what they’ll do.

Nonsense. If President Trump helps broker this deal, not only will he easily win a Nobel Peace prize, he will also have sealed a positive historical legacy for what would be monumental achievement.

The American Presidency has never seen a man like this. Indeed, it is uniquely talented and idiosyncratic leaders who make the best Presidents—despite any "flaws" which the now-irrelevant Propaganda Media obsesses on.

On balance, President Trump should go down as a great President, even though I—as a libertarian (note small "l")—may categorically disagree with him on some policy issues, among which is not legal or illegal immigration (although the President could certainly enhance his popularity and effectiveness by being a little less blunt and a little more diplomatic in his comments on the topic).

President Trump is far from perfect—most of God's chosen instruments have deep flaws—but even if he only serves one term, I think he'll accomplish a lot positive. Eventually, history will have to acknowledge it.

I love the man for what he's doing and what he plans to do. To my mind, nothing is more important than draining the Uniparty Establishment Swamp—and the President plans to do it—without being removed from office.

God Bless President Trump...

59 posted on 05/26/2018 4:14:02 PM PDT by sargon ("If the President doesn't drain the Swamp, the Swamp will drain the President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
If he fixes the North Korea problem, then he will deserve it and more so than Obama.

If President Trump farts and says "Excuse me", then he will deserve the Nobel Prize more so than Obama.

60 posted on 05/26/2018 4:16:06 PM PDT by sargon ("If the President doesn't drain the Swamp, the Swamp will drain the President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson