“2) Possession is a legal concept from the drug war that implies that a person has a contraband item on or about ones person, or has control over the item, perhaps by having it in a motor vehicle or in a home.
Because both of these thingspossession and semi-automatic weaponsare easy to define, theyre easy to regulate.”
I can’t believe this buffoon actually cites the “drug war” to promote his licensing scheme (which is the worst camel nose to ever get under a tent; why would we barter away our rights in exchange for not infringing our rights?).
Earth to Idiot: the “drug war” is a comprehensive failure. The US is awash with meth, synthetic and natural marijuana, “bath salts”, etc., 116 people are DYING every day from opioid abuse, billions of dollars are sent out of the country, millions of Americans are unemployable bums due to drugs and others criminals who deal in forbidden goods, precisely because bans make them valuable. The “gun violence” in America is fueled by drug trafficking gangs, and addicts committing robbery, identity fraud, etc. to get money for dope.
Does he think that criminal gangs wouldn’t move into any niche where “banned” or restricted licensed possession creates a demand?
Yep, so I presume people will be able to get a license for their kids, neighbors, babysitters, etc.
The author's ideas are beyond stupid.
That’s my thought exactly. What’s even worse is that people can 3d print either the gun or parts to assemble a gun with.