Posted on 04/25/2018 8:21:21 PM PDT by deks
The report begins with this statement: "Robert Mueller has a long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people that is a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence. He lacks the judgment and credibility to lead the prosecution of anyone."
What I have accumulated here is absolutely shocking upon the realization that Muellers disreputable, twisted history speaks to the character of the man placed in a position to attempt to legalize a coup against a lawfully elected President, writes GOP Congressman Louie Gohmert.
Gohmert is referring to the exhaustive expose he just released called: Robert Mueller: Unmasked. [linked in full in the article]
The 48 page read is fascinating highlighting some of the most bizarre bits of Bobby Muellers long history in the Deep State Swamp.
(Excerpt) Read more at constitution.com ...
But Rudy’s said he has a lot of respect for Mueller, and looks forward to rapping the whole thing up in a week or so.
Lol.. yes of course the all caps boom. Maybe mods could add it.
Try just:
Robert Mueller has a long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people, a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence!
And follow with snark aimed at federal pigs such as Comey's counsel Robert Fitzgerald, whose life's achievement (putting away Scooter Libby) just got undone by POTUS, or Mueller's #1 goon Andrew Weissmann. Or Mueller himself.
Congressman Gohmert confirms: Mueller is a weasel.
_____________________________-
Just another Trojan Horse wheeled into D.C. from the Deep State stables. And, oh my how the crowds welcomed and worshiped him. Inside, he brought an army of legal henchmen. Yes, Obozo was the more elaborate lead Trojan Horse that was constructed and crafted by the Deep State to overthrow the nation. Deception is the only way Communists can advance their agenda.
A very good read. Mueller’s failure to produce indicates he’s fabricating corrupt evidence for enemies of the Constitution, if he is consistent with his past behavior. Track who he’s communicating with.
I salute you for a fine job. Thanks.
pFL
Decent summary.
I might add, skip the 1st 3 pages of the report.
35-year attorney here. The sentence makes perfect sense.
The phrase that precedes the word “that” reads like the subject, not a modifier. The sentence may diagram either way but it sounds really really awkward when read out loud from a common sense point of view. Legalese is not for everyone - especially the common sense crowd. The casual observer would see this instantly - if they looked.
He may be, but according to the "pundits", he's an "honorable" weasel....
Well it would have been nice had Rosenstein initiated a background investigation into Mueller prior to appointing him. It would have turned up the same info that Ghomert just released. And Mueller and his hired goon squad would have never happened.
Maybe there should be a law requiring such a background investigation, led by an independent office branch of the AG. Then if Rosenstein failed to follow the law, he could be fired or impeached. And Mueller shut down.
Oh wait...there is such a law!!!
28 CFR 603:
(b) The Attorney General shall consult with the Assistant Attorney General for Administration to ensure an appropriate method of appointment, and to ensure that a Special Counsel undergoes an appropriate background investigation and a detailed review of ethics and conflicts of interest issues.”
Did Rosenstein do this?!? Did he follow the law?
I sent this to DeSantis, my Representative, yesterday. And asked the nice woman fo ask that question. Will follow up today, and also call Ghomert’s folks.
Yes, “stain” refers back to “history”, which are both singular. It is crystal clear unless you take the words out of context.
I am not a snowflake. However there is No need to get vulgar about this. Enjoy your day.
Bullshit, dude. Obviously you are a leftist shill trying to kick up dirt where none exists. And no the common sense approach is not to parse the sentence like a Clinton but to give it the obviously unintended meaning.
If you parse the sentence, .....innocent people that is the stain.... makes no sense. It does not imply anyting.
I failed English three times in high school, but let me take a crack at this. I think everything is modifying the object of the sentence history.
Robert Mueller has a history
-of illicitly targeting innocent people
-that is a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence.
-(it is) long and sordid
I think if the stain part of the sentence was supposed to modify people and not history, then it would have to be who are instead of that is.
So the sentence structure seems correct to me. But again, I have a history of failure.
Howie Carr. He lived in the courtrooms during the whole ordeal.
Larri...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.