Skip to comments.
In Intense Arguments, Supreme Court Appears Ready To Side With Trump On Travel Ban
npr.com ^
| April 25, 2018
| Nina Totenberg
Posted on 04/25/2018 10:15:22 AM PDT by John W
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: billyboy15
Three words:
Post
Constitutional
America
61
posted on
04/25/2018 1:48:48 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(What America needs is more Hogg control.)
To: Lazamataz
You mean bath house Barry’s lover?
62
posted on
04/25/2018 1:55:24 PM PDT
by
2CAVTrooper
(Democrats... BETRAYING America since 1828.)
To: John W
"
the court does not usually second-guess a president's national security decisions"
As it shouldn't. If the President needs a check on national security, it must only come from Congress...not the courts.
63
posted on
04/25/2018 2:05:35 PM PDT
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: Lazamataz
“Post Constitutional America”
Lol,it’s a phrase and nothing more. Do you believe it too be true because you say it?
To: Lazamataz
65
posted on
04/25/2018 3:06:24 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(As a southerner I've never trusted the Grand Old Party.....any questions?)
To: John W
Siding with the argument that the president controls foreign policy over third-rate hack circuit judges is correct.
Deciding that judges can control a president’s foreign policy decisions absolutely ensures a revolution against the judiciary.
Decide wisely, USSC.
66
posted on
04/25/2018 4:14:29 PM PDT
by
sergeantdave
(Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
To: Regulator
After other SCOTUS decisions unfavorable to the left, the left took the cases again to a lower court and got SCOTUS overruled, believe it or not. Do not be surprised if, losing this case, the left makes still another try, despite the SCOTUS ruling.
67
posted on
04/25/2018 4:18:32 PM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: John W
68
posted on
04/25/2018 4:27:36 PM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: Lazamataz
“Some Federal Judge from Hawaii will simply issue a stay order on the Supreme Court decision, then overturn them later this month.”
Suppose we find a federal judge who rules that Americans can buy full-auto weapons and that abortion is illegal in every state.
The judiciary would explode, and humpty-dumpty’s men could not put him back together again.
69
posted on
04/25/2018 4:28:00 PM PDT
by
sergeantdave
(Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
To: billyboy15
Do you believe it too be true because you say it? I believe it to be too good to be true BECAUSE I say it.
70
posted on
04/25/2018 4:42:09 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(What America needs is more Hogg control.)
To: sergeantdave
Suppose we find a federal judge who rules that Americans can buy full-auto weapons and that abortion is illegal in every state.I like the cut of your jib, mister.
71
posted on
04/25/2018 4:42:58 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(What America needs is more Hogg control.)
To: robroys woman
In a sane world, a judge wouldn’t rule that a program started by a previous director of HS could not be canceled without congressional approval (even though congress didn’t create it).
72
posted on
04/25/2018 5:36:39 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
To: John W
"that idea of exclusion is fueling the resistance to Trump and firing up liberals for this year's midterms." Well some diehard liberals like bringing in more jihadis and rapists, most likely voters do not.
73
posted on
04/25/2018 6:56:07 PM PDT
by
palmer
(...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
To: Jim 0216
And POTUS could and SHOULD reject and ignore unconstitutional SCROTUS rulings with notification of constitutional-based rationale for doing so. Trump doesn’t get that yet. Trump respects both the Constitution and the process. He had abided by all the rulings, as he should.
74
posted on
04/25/2018 6:58:35 PM PDT
by
palmer
(...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
To: palmer
-
Trump respects both the Constitution and the process. Yes.
Does Trump understand the Constitution?
Not necessarily
He had abided by all the rulings, as he should.
No.
He and we can and SHOULD stand against unconstitutional federal acts and decisions which are acts and decisions of tyranny.
I believe Trump is doing the best he can. I'm afraid his advisers are law-school trained where they DON'T teach the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended which is the greatest reason why we now have a mostly tyrannical, unconstitutional $4 trillion government.
75
posted on
04/25/2018 7:08:26 PM PDT
by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: 4Liberty
76
posted on
04/25/2018 7:20:47 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: John W
Not tired of winning yet.
77
posted on
04/25/2018 7:23:45 PM PDT
by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
To: John W
I can’t help but think that woman who grabbed the mike in Texas had something to do with their possible action.
To: firebrand
To: Electric Graffiti
Can you say “Constitutional Crisis?”
80
posted on
04/25/2018 8:23:01 PM PDT
by
arrogantsob
(See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
