Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2
Problem is we don’t/didn’t have the lift capacity to get ‘em into orbit.

Not sure that orbit is needed. If a KEP is delivered from the stratosphere or above would it need to be a 20 ton projectile? Terminal velocity would probably be a given and the projectile would be sized for the mission. Could be done without encroaching on their airspace (toss bombing) and if done with stealth tech, what would anybody know except for something that has multiple possible explanations.

No knowledge, just speculation!

63 posted on 04/25/2018 12:48:56 PM PDT by SES1066 (Happiness is a depressed Washington, DC housing market!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: SES1066
Terminal velocity

This is the limiting factor for KEP. If you rely on kinetic energy only, did you know that the terminal velocity for even a 1000 kg object the size of a small refrigerator dropped from space (17000 mph orbit speed) is slowed to less than 200 mph by the atmosphere by the time reaches the surface? When you do the sims using the physics, its harder to make a KE weapon effective than it might seem. (This is also why we are well protected against most meteor threats.)

71 posted on 04/25/2018 1:12:43 PM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: SES1066

Good speculating.
I was fixating on the “tungsten telephone pole” analogy, so followed the numbers re: a 20 ton mass.
Even at 1 ton, lift capacity is a problem - rockets are high-visibility, and I’m sure others have means of getting a good look at a long, thin, mostly featureless satellite that just hangs there.
Then that object disappears from orbit, minutes before a gaping crater appears at a notorious site. Pretty clear what happened, even if it can’t be proven per se.
Anything much less than 1 ton probably fast loses the point/expense of putting it up there. Impact becomes comparable to comparable-cost weapons which can impact much faster (vs awaiting orbital positioning).

Like solar power and EVs, RFGs have their problems but are tantalizingly attractive in their very simplicity (well, to some of us).


72 posted on 04/25/2018 1:12:59 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The Red Queen wasn't kidding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson