Posted on 04/19/2018 10:02:43 PM PDT by astrat7
When did this happen? I think she revealed something she should not have?
> “Q is careless and ignorant.”
Shows your bias or deficiency in info processing. Read why.
Q never mentioned missiles, nukes.
> “Pelosis comment references missile technology, not nukes.”
Yes, Pelosi talks about missiles AND proliferation. Proliferation is a term used in context of nukes. If you don’t follow, take it up with Pelosi.
NK has sophisticated missiles. They bought them. Bought them with what? Arms trade. Pelosi knows.
> “What Pelosi said does not sound the least bit classified, it is common knowledge”
Highest level intel knows that certain agents selling the US out, selling to many rogues, NK included. Pelosi mentions intel, buying/selling.
Q says Pelosi’s statements yesterday will bury her. Is Pelosi implicated in arms deals? She is worth 100s of millions. Q says think net worth in reference to Pelosi.
My take: Pelosi is not negotiating arms sales with NK, she has others to do that. She acts as broker and collects a percentage.
The open questions are what is NK trading in return?
Narcotics?
Children?
Plutonium?
I saw this one before... the Roadrunner gives Wiley coyote a black hole. It didn’t work out so well for the coyote. Nancy.
Hatch act only applies to whom they choose. Ya know like every law!
ROFL. This Q clown has colonized your brain. Seek help.
1991too
She comingled technologies and made a careful refetence to minitutaruation... TI too much information and when in a committee position it becomes a statement. Even things know may not be speculative generalizations by members.
She didn’t make a “careful reference” to miniaturization, she merely used the word without providing any context, detail, or evidence that she knows much about it. Mere usage of the word “miniaturization” in reference to ballistic missile warheads is not classified, it is common usage.
There is nothing in her comments that appears classified or that she could possibly be in trouble over. It is a very generic, innocuous kind of statement.
It is a bipolar lot.
Agreed. They read into cryptic remarks just about anything they want to believe was said or imagined or implied, and then they free associate words until they come up with a story that seems exciting enough to fill a thread with silly comments.
I say just RAT DROPPINGS
Thanks astrat7.
To: bagster
Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real.
664 posted on 5/5/2018, 6:47:12 PM by Enchante
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3652490/posts?page=664#664
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.