Mark says now with Gorsuch’s vote there’s going to be many more criminals in this country that would have otherwise been deported by Trump.
So we have a decision like this and we have sanctuary cities. Mark asks, is this in the best interest of the American people? It is going to be much harder to deport criminals that are here from other countries, if they can be deported at all.
Too bad this is discussed so inaccurately on FR and most quarters if it is even discussed at all. Because we need to focus on Stormy Daniels and her lawyer. Two losers.
Think Progress isn’t too happy with Gorsuch’s decision:
“Neil Gorsuch voted with the liberal justices, but his opinion should chill you to the bone”
https://thinkprogress.org/neil-gorsuch-voted-with-the-liberal-justices-ca1cc1e2fae0/
As I told Impy, I don't think this ruling is nearly as bad as Obamacare -- HOWEVER, I am seeing a similar level of spin the way numerous FReepers tried to defend Roberts' Obamacare decision at the time and claim it was really a GOOD thing and that he had "embarrassed Obama by forcing him to admit its a tax" and how he "sent it back to Congress to tell them how to do their job right" and how it would "make Obama a one term president as long as the mandate is still in effect on election day"
There just seems to be a desire on "our side" to defend "our guys" at all costs and try to spin the hell out of awful decisions they make so we can justify that they were still the "right person" for the job.
You saw the same spin when Rand Paul supported amnesty, Sarah Palin supported a RAT backed candidate for Alaska Governor, Fred Thompson supported the unconstitutional "Popular Vote Compact" to go around the electoral college with the popular vote, Justin Amash voted in favor of HAMAS, etc... "gosh, they're only taking that position cuz they HAVE TO for Constitutional reasons!"
The sad thing is that if Gorsuch sided with the four Democrat judges tomorrow and issued some insane ruling like 5 year olds have a "right" to taxpayer funded transgender surgery, some on FR would be out in force to claim that Gorsuch only voted that way because the constitution REQUIRES five year olds to get transgender surgery, and he has to follow an "textual approach" and do what the constitution tells him to.