My handgun holds only 10 bullets in the removable clip, and I feel perfectly safe with it. Because I go to the gun range and practice frequently. If I need additional firepower, I have spare magazines. But I will not need those to stop an invader or 2.
I am laughing out loud thinking some people need a 50 bullet capacity magazine to defend themselves.
So because you don't want a maagazine that holds more than 10 rounds, you're fine with the government banning them? That's the logic of those in favor of control, period.
By the way, you didn't answer my question. An oversight, I'm sure. I'll repeat it for your convenience:
Pray tell, why do you need a 10 shot magazine, then? Would you be in favor a 6 round limit?
4 round limit?
Single shot only?
I don’t need 50 rounds to defend myself. I need 50 rounds to kill leftist hordes of scum. Your lack of support is noted.
The 2nd Amendment isn’t just about defending one’s self - its primary purpose is to defend this country. Primarily to defend against its own government. But what is needed even more than 50-round magazines is the formation of organized state militias. Militias of the type seen in the 1770’s (not the current style of a handful of guys that get together on the weekends at “the compound”).