Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is This China’s Stealth Bomber?
Popular Mechanics ^ | Apr 10, 2018 | Kyle Mizokami

Posted on 04/16/2018 8:57:33 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: DaveA37

““I wonder how devastating loss of a single dam would be to their country.”.........
Perhaps we could convince”Little Fat Boy” ...”

I thought you were asking what a nuclear bomb would do to a dam.

Fat Man and Little Boy were the names of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki...


21 posted on 04/17/2018 5:28:24 AM PDT by BBB333 (The Power Of Trump Compels You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: UCANSEE2
"...instead of trying to track a plane with radar, we shall have to track the condensed air trail or the air pressure envelope..."

Freeper Jeff Head wrote about this in his novels, wherein we go to war with China - they learn to defeat our stealth technology in this manner, rendering "stealth" obsolete.

23 posted on 04/17/2018 6:27:03 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Idiocracy is here, and it votes democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Thats all they do on Star Trek when trapped in a nebula while engaged with an adversary. Just follow the other guys tail pipe. He has to be burning something to make his ship “go”.


24 posted on 04/17/2018 8:20:27 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Build The Wall !! Jail The Cankle !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1

heh heh heh... techno-dog


25 posted on 04/17/2018 2:39:34 PM PDT by Chode (You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chode

LOL, more like Lil’ Miss Piggy.


26 posted on 04/17/2018 8:59:52 PM PDT by mabarker1 ((Progress- the opposite of congress))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

It is no longer fiction anyway.

Same thing applies to Navy Ships and Subs. You can have all kinds of stealth tec on a ship to disable radar, but you can’t hide the wake.


27 posted on 04/18/2018 3:37:33 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike
Don’t you just develop different sensors and then the plane shows up like a big radar blip again?

Yep.

28 posted on 04/18/2018 3:38:55 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I remember the B-70 never got past the prototype stage, because the Soviets developed missiles that could shoot it down and they no longer had to rely on interceptors. I could see the $10’s of billions spent on stealth going the same way.

North American XB-70 Valkyrie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_XB-70_Valkyrie


29 posted on 04/18/2018 4:37:07 PM PDT by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I work on ships in a tangential way.

We had a contract with the Navy and I got to see the docs, and one of the topics was hiding surface vessels by spraying them and the immediate area with mass amounts of water.

That was a new one for me; never heard of that before.


30 posted on 04/18/2018 6:55:19 PM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Idiocracy is here, and it votes democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan
We had a contract with the Navy and I got to see the docs, and one of the topics was hiding surface vessels by spraying them and the immediate area with mass amounts of water.

Still wouldn't hide the wake.

31 posted on 04/19/2018 7:04:43 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Sure, I just thought it was unique and novel, and had never heard of that tactic before.

Apparently it hides the heat signature.


32 posted on 04/19/2018 8:27:19 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Idiocracy is here, and it votes democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan
and had never heard of that tactic before.

I hadn't either. When I read what you posted, I was trying to 'picture' what that would require and look like.

First thought was


33 posted on 04/21/2018 7:19:09 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson