Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is This China’s Stealth Bomber?
Popular Mechanics ^ | Apr 10, 2018 | Kyle Mizokami

Posted on 04/16/2018 8:57:33 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 04/16/2018 8:57:33 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Looks like a swing wing.


2 posted on 04/16/2018 9:00:07 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If Japan had not had their Constitution re-written to be pacifist by us after WW II do you think they would have been “China” during the 80’s and early 90’s at the height of their financial might?

Would they have filled the Asian power vacuum and perhaps gone expansionist like the Chinese are going to do eventually?


3 posted on 04/16/2018 9:02:58 PM PDT by PittsburghAfterDark (The American media: We do what the Soviet media did without the guns to our head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Extrapolated copy of the F23... which I always thought should be a replacement for the F111 and better for bombing than the F35


4 posted on 04/16/2018 9:07:15 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

In the future, instead of trying to track a plane with radar, we shall have to track the condensed air trail or the air pressure envelope.


5 posted on 04/16/2018 9:07:28 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Hate to say it, but that is a mean looking plane. I hope we are never on the business end of it.


6 posted on 04/16/2018 9:13:30 PM PDT by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If the shtf, I wonder how much fuel reserves the Chinese have?


7 posted on 04/16/2018 9:14:09 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (When the strong man, fully armed, guards his own dwelling, his goods are safe. -Luke 11:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Looks like a swing wing...without the hinges.


8 posted on 04/16/2018 9:23:02 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Looks like a low-poly cgi render, complete with artist’s signature in the upper right.


9 posted on 04/16/2018 9:24:35 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

They’ve got to be in there somewhere otherwise it won’t be able to fly supersonic?


10 posted on 04/16/2018 9:32:43 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

A stealth bomber is of little importance unless used against an adversary of great anti aircraft ability with most very sophisticated radar.

One must note that in the attack on Syria we also used the B1 bomber along with seaborne cruise missiles. Syria does have a very good air defense system from the Russians. The B1 which is not stealth launched their missiles far out of range of this very good air defense system. They hit their targets and went home and had a beer.

In a real nuclear exchange it will be missiles and most will get to target, theirs and ours. Hell, the B52 bomb truck would launch cruise missiles over the arctic in a a nuclear exchange with Russia. The vast majority of those cruise missiles would reach target. The B52 has a radar signature like a barn door. It would launch its cruise missiles far away and its radar signature would be of no importance.


11 posted on 04/16/2018 9:45:03 PM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, roughneck, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

That has always been my problem with this technology. Don’t you just develop different sensors and then the plane shows up like a big radar blip again?


12 posted on 04/16/2018 9:51:19 PM PDT by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Stealthy? Lol.


13 posted on 04/16/2018 10:28:00 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Wings not swept enough for efficient supercruise. With enough thrust it would go fast, but not that fast. It would be a fuel burner.


14 posted on 04/16/2018 10:28:57 PM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Exactly.


15 posted on 04/16/2018 10:42:15 PM PDT by Tamatoa (Fight for our America, Fight for our Country I fought to defend!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; Chode
In the future, instead of trying to track a plane with radar, we shall have to track the condensed air trail or the air pressure envelope.

We have a 3 year old Boxer that’s Deaf and has been using almost the very same to know when the refrigerator door is opened but in reverse order, Pressure Wave 1st and Flavor Trail 2nd. She can do it from any room in the house.🐾🐶

16 posted on 04/16/2018 10:42:35 PM PDT by mabarker1 ((Progress- the opposite of congress))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike
Don’t you just develop different sensors and then the plane shows up like a big radar blip again?

No.

Unless you read Popular mechaniz..

17 posted on 04/16/2018 10:56:41 PM PDT by doorgunner69 (Give me the liberty to take care of my own security..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
My first thought was of the F-23.


Northrop F-23 Black Widow II

18 posted on 04/17/2018 12:29:17 AM PDT by Daaave ("You Nexus, huh? I design your eyes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

I wonder how devastating loss of a single dam would be to their country.


19 posted on 04/17/2018 2:27:01 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
“I wonder how devastating loss of a single dam would be to their country.”.........

Perhaps we could convince"Little Fat Boy" to reselect his intended target towards China. Would be a lot more territory than a flood or two.

20 posted on 04/17/2018 4:16:27 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson