Adding 3 or 4 more Dim Senators? With the state fraud level, don’t count on any GOP wins.
They’ll want PR, too, for an even state addition number.
We’ll get at least 2 new pub Senators, and they’ll get maybe 2 new ‘rat Senators.
Adding new Dem senators is comparable to FDR’s failed court packing plan imo.
Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937
In fact, note that the admission of Nevada to the Union was an attempt to ensure Lincoln’s reelection and Republican control of Congress.
"Statehood was rushed to the date of October 31 to help ensure Abraham Lincoln's reelection on November 8 and post-Civil War Republican dominance in Congress, as Nevada's mining-based economy tied it to the more industrialized Union.”—Nevada
At this point in time, what reason is there to divide a state into smaller states other than for the post-17th Amendment ratification Progressive Movement to maintain control of state powers and state revenues that the corrupt feds are continually stealing from the states? Insights welcome.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States."Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." —me
"Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, Congress actually not having the express constitutional authority to make most appropriations laws where domestic policy is concerned. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." —me
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Perhaps Texas should have a “nuclear” option to divide into 10 red states?
Yeah, look at each area. Northern California would go dem because of San Fransisco/Oakland, and Sacramento. California would be dominated by Los Angelis voters, so 2 more dem senators. Southern California has San Diego.
They split this up to create 4 new democrat senators.
I’m thinking it might be the other way around. The counties and cities that are bucking the, Sanctuary policies, are in the Northern and Southern California states. A little aggressive enforcement and the illegals could start moving to the new, California. A significant portion of those areas are Conservative, so who knows.
Now, if they could just move the border of Washington and Oregon and have it cut the states in two, going North to South, that could be two more Republicans. Give the radical Leftists the coast and give the farmers and ranchers the east side, where they already live and they won’t be effected by the loonie policies of the liberals.