Of course it isn't. Everybody knows that it's made by Banquet ...
so who did the Russians buy it from
Of course it isn't. Everybody knows that it's made by Banquet ...
“...and has never been produced in Russia.”
Gee, and I was under the impression that the Soviets had great chemists.
The Russians don’t know how to make it? Don’t beleive that.
A Russian guy gets caught with a stolen car. He gets acquitted at trial for the above logical argument. An American and a Brit used to own the car. And it wasn’t made in Russia. So clearly he’s innocent, right?
Report from “South Asian” leading news agency; and
“Moscow [Russia], Apr. 15 (ANI): Russian Foreign Minister Sergei”>Sergei Lavrov claimed on Saturday that the toxin used to poison former double agent Sergei”>Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, was BZ toxin, as confirmed by a Swiss laboratory.”
So, if this is not Russian disinformation via “South Asia’s Leading Multimedia News Agency”, do they cite independent source FROM the Swiss Lab. No.
So it is essentially NOT about a Swiss Lab report, but a report out of Moscow via a news agency in India.
Since there was no link in the article to any information on the Swiss report I went & did a search & came up with a Zerohedge article...
How could the British get something so wrong, when inflaming relations with the Russians can be so problematic? Are they TRYING to start the next World War?
I seriously wonder what is going on here. Who can be trusted?!
Why would Russia want to kill former double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia?
Revenge is an obvious answer. They could also want to silence Skripal (but he likely gave the UK all the intel he had). Another reason is as a warning to other agents thinking of crossing the Russian government.
But what if some government, the UK, US, or other, wanted to incite action against Russia and turn world opinion against the Soviets?
The daughter has since recovered and is now in hiding.
Why? To protect her from another murder attempt? Or protect the people she might inadvertently expose as the real culprits.
If true the guilty party now has a problem; a living witness that was supposed to have been eliminated.
It would be embarrassing to the guilty party if during an interview Yulia let it slip the last thing she remembers before succumbing to the poison is some nice, middle-age British woman bumping into her and her father while walking in the park.
It would certainly benefit the guilty party to now isolate their surviving victim (witness) and reassuring her exactly what happened to her happened is the way they say it happened and not the way she believes it happened.
We believe these kinds of ideas when we read them in spy novels. The reason we do is because they're plausible.
* This is all pure speculation on my part.
Russia, russia, russia...
I still believe the Clintons are involved and sending a message.
SS1
IT WASN”T THE RUSSIANS NO IT WAS GEORGE BUSH FALSE FLAG LOUSY RINO PUTIN IS OUR FREIND !!11!!!!!
