To: McGruff
Somehow 12 ships and armada just don't go together when one thinks about TF 38 of the 3rd Fleet in WWII which consisted of 8 Fleet Carriers, 8 light carriers, 6 battleships, 6 heavy cruisers, 9 light cruisers, 58 destroyers.
I do realize the difference in firepower and capability though. Just focusing on the numbers.
19 posted on
04/13/2018 9:48:23 AM PDT by
ealgeone
To: ealgeone
I’ll supplement your observation about modern task force size with a comment about “steaming” as an anachronistic way to describe Naval propulsion in the 21st century.
To: ealgeone
Somehow 12 ships and armada just don't go together when one thinks about TF 38 of the 3rd Fleet in WWII which consisted of 8 Fleet Carriers, 8 light carriers, 6 battleships, 6 heavy cruisers, 9 light cruisers, 58 destroyers. I do realize the difference in firepower and capability though. Just focusing on the numbers
Bear in mind, in 1945 we spent 42% of GDP on defense. In 2016 it was 3%.
Also, a Fletcher-class destroyer cost $6 million in WW2 (in 1945 dollars, of course). An Arleigh Burke-class destroyer costs $1.8 billion. Even taking inflation into account, that's 21 times more expensive!
To: ealgeone
They gravity bombed using eyesight. We can precision bomb today where 1 bomb take the place of over 1,000 bombs.
66 posted on
04/13/2018 10:46:28 AM PDT by
CodeToad
(The Democrats haven't been this pissed off since the Republiverycans took their slaves away.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson