To: Mr Ramsbotham
It put terrorism sponsors on notice that the U.S. would come after them personally. I think we're still reaping the benefits. Huh?
The biggest sponsors of radical Islamic terrorism remain unscathed in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
Meanwhile, the U.S. uses its military might against secular dictators who represent no threat to us at all.
30 posted on
04/08/2018 8:53:34 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
To: Alberta's Child
The biggest sponsors of radical Islamic terrorism remain unscathed in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. I've long since maintained that on Sept 12 2001, we should have blown the Sows off the map. No troops, no UN, just no more Sowdie cities.
And when we discovered the Pakirs were harboring OBL....the same to them.
Then there's Iran.
(there's still time for that)
36 posted on
04/08/2018 9:01:56 AM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(The Obama is about to hit the fan.)
To: Alberta's Child
The biggest sponsors of radical Islamic terrorism remain unscathed in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Perhaps they do. How many 911s have occurred on U.S. soil since Bush went after the Taliban and Saddam Hussein?
41 posted on
04/08/2018 9:04:16 AM PDT by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: Alberta's Child
You are exactly right. We should not get involved in wars against secular dictators who pose no threat to us.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson