I stand corrected.
Thanks, Egon. Still, the point remains that people
get caught up in the terms and commas of the 2A and
what the Fed #29 means. Men settled disputes with
dueling pistols and we’re supposed to believe today
that firearm ownership was meant to be limited to
militias?
Seems to me that this modern effort to repeal the 2A
is an admittance that it means what we have always
claimed, a private citizen right. Thanks, again
PS: Federalist #46 should be required reading.