Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired Justice Stevens Puts Democrats on a Pin with Call to Repeal Second Amendment
Townhall.com ^ | April 2, 2018 | John Kass

Posted on 04/02/2018 11:58:36 AM PDT by Kaslin

Democrats are panicking over retired Supreme Court Justice John Stevens' comments on repealing the Second Amendment.

You know they're panicking when they insist they're not panicking.

It is one thing for the left to slowly, carefully, methodically gut the Bill of Rights by using the media and their children's crusade as proxies.

But it's quite another thing to honestly declare your intentions about repealing the Second Amendment, which is what Stevens -- a Republican appointee but a liberal -- is advocating.

At least Stevens is honest about it, which is what you'd expect of a 97-year-old Cubs fan who saw Babe Ruth's called shot at Wrigley. But he's driven Democrats crazy.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, yes, but what if you don't want to admit to the American public -- before the 2018 elections -- that shredding the Second Amendment is what's on the menu?

You panic and say, "That is not what I meant, that is not what I meant at all," as you're fixed upon a pin as in the T.S. Eliot poem, which is exactly what Stevens' op-ed in The New York Times did to the left.

Stevens fixed them on a pin, like insects on a board. An honest pin, to be sure, but a pin nevertheless.

So until Democrats can figure out an escape without demeaning the retired justice, those bent on trashing the long-held American right to bear arms just might want to remember happier times.

Like those halcyon days when they hadn't yet driven all the moderate Democrats out of their party, when John Kerry was running for president.

Kerry, the impossibly rich liberal, a beneficiary of the Heinz ketchup fortune thanks to his wife, was a worldly fellow, comfortable on a yacht. But he was plagued by his patrician, upper-crust demeanor.

Some political brain decided Kerry should go a duck huntin' and demonstrate his love for the Second Amendment. And he got all dressed up like Elmer Fudd.

All that was missing was the Fudd hat with the ear flaps. But that would have ruined Kerry's hair.

Somebody shot some ducks -- or perhaps an aide had them quietly strangled -- but either way Kerry proudly carried those dead ducks around for news photographers, to demonstrate his reverence for the Second Amendment and the American right to kill some ducks.

The Bill of Rights doesn't exactly mention duck hunting, but liberals have a way of conflating hunting with the right to bear arms.

Kerry didn't care. He even dropped his patrician airs for the afternoon and walked around like an animatronic Orvis catalog. And, he got some nice Ohio mud on his boots.

The photo op might have worked, if Kerry hadn't been wearing obviously stiff new gear, which made him look exactly what he was: a liberal politician in store-bought huntin' clothes pandering for regular folks' votes in Ohio by carrying a shotgun and a bunch of dead ducks.

Will we ever see Democrats touch a gun again in a photo op?

Perhaps, but they'll need a safe emotional distance between any fake Second Amendment reverence and that other recent Democratic event:

That children's crusade of the left called March for Our Lives, which was treated as some kind of spontaneous happening rather than carefully orchestrated theater.

In it, the young protesters held signs and spent George Clooney's money while demanding the government take away Americans' guns, because, in the words of student leader and apprentice demagogue David Hogg, stupid parents just can't be trusted with democracy.

"When your old-ass parent is like, 'I don't know how to send an iMessage,' and you're just like, 'Give me the (expletive deleted) phone and let me handle it,'" said Hogg in an earlier interview. "Sadly, that's what we have to do with our government; our parents don't know how to use a (expletive deleted) democracy, so we have to."

Of course you do. So just do it.

That's exactly what Stevens advocated in his New York Times op-ed piece.

Stevens wrote that he was moved by the demonstrations in Washington and other major cities, adding that they reveal broad public support for legislation to minimize the risks of mass killings by those with guns.

"But the demonstrators should seek more effective and more lasting reform," wrote Stevens. "They should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment."

It would be a more honest debate if Democrats would just drop the pretense and the mealy-mouthing and the business of carrying dead ducks around and follow Stevens's lead by declaring they want to repeal the Second Amendment. And have their candidates make that position clear in the upcoming midterms.

But Democrats are wriggling on that pin, saying they really don't want to mess with the Second Amendment.

"Not if they'd like to keep their jobs," said one of CNN's many leftists-in-residence, Symone Sanders, a former press secretary for socialist presidential candidate Bernie Sanders.

This is what happens when Democrats allow folks on the right and the Republican Party to define and frame the conversation," she explained, though Justice Stevens isn't exactly of the right.

And some of those young people in March for Our Lives demanded America get rid of its guns, but Sanders said she wouldn't go that far.

"Children are very different than elected Democratic representation."

In other words, use the children's crusade until you can't. And insist you really don't want to gut the Bill of Rights, until it's done.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; democrats; dncstrategy; johnpaulstevens; marchforourlives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 04/02/2018 11:58:36 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
...a 97-year-old Cubs fan who saw Babe Ruth's called shot at Wrigley.

So he did actually accomplish something worthwhile in his life...

;-)

2 posted on 04/02/2018 12:01:19 PM PDT by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

At least Stevens is honest.
Feinswine and Schemer wants to ban guns, too, but won’t say it out loud.


3 posted on 04/02/2018 12:05:37 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If the Democrats were actually opposed by a party that wanted to beat them, this would be a big problem.


4 posted on 04/02/2018 12:05:40 PM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Call for boycott against Kass by Camera Hogg in 5..4..3..


5 posted on 04/02/2018 12:07:02 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

You are correct. He is an honest dim-wit.


6 posted on 04/02/2018 12:08:01 PM PDT by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

The Republicans haven’t been quite as good as loosing as the Washington Generals, but they try hard, and in the end may out underperform the Generals before the Republic is done.


7 posted on 04/02/2018 12:08:47 PM PDT by Hieronymus (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I curse the day Gerald Ford introduced this ass hat to the court.


8 posted on 04/02/2018 12:08:48 PM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He still has to answer for Roe v. Wade.


9 posted on 04/02/2018 12:09:21 PM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

...Will we ever see Democrats touch a gun again in a photo op...

They tried again in a picture of our feckless President Zer0 “shooting” a shotgun at Camp David. After obvious errors pointed out in the supposed press Op photo, it subsequently disappeared.


10 posted on 04/02/2018 12:09:49 PM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My bad, he did not vote on Roe v. Wade. I am confusing him with Potter Stewart.


11 posted on 04/02/2018 12:12:55 PM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And remember Biden telling people to fire a couple of rounds off their balcony with their double Barrel (of course) to run off criminals. An act that will get you arrested in every city and.many other places.
Dems can’t even pull off a pro gun scam and get away with it.


12 posted on 04/02/2018 12:13:34 PM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why is it that Democrats are so good at finding progressive POS to be judges but Republicans so bad at avoiding them?


13 posted on 04/02/2018 12:17:22 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Democrats....Nutcases, America Haters, Religion Haters, Baby Killers, Traitors & Turncoats...all of them. And...one of their bright shinning stars...the protege of Congresswoman, Debbi Wasserman Schultz, the real promoter & abettor of the slaughter murder of Seventeen South Florida innocents, Broward County, Florida, Incompetent, Inaction, Low Life, Sheriff, Scott Israel.

By the way, glorious Republican Governor Rick Scott, “When do you think you will finally get around to firing Scott Israel, along with his police cowards and all the Democrat Party Public Service Employees of Broward County that knew what was coming and did nothing to stop or prevent it. Sad... Governor, Scott. I used to think and believe you were a decent sort...no more...you are just as guilty as the Democrats of Broward County that let this murder, slaughter, massacre go forward.

Too bad the citizens and voters of Broward County cannot see the forest for the trees. Go figure!!! I guess they love Wasserman Schultz more then they did their supposed beloved children. Bad, Sad, days in Broward County, Florida, and the Florida statehouse.


14 posted on 04/02/2018 12:17:42 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

Republicans should adopt a pot of well boiled linguine for a mascot because real elephants have backbones.


15 posted on 04/02/2018 12:18:38 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
They can't find 10 or so million illegals how are they going to find 100 million guns? Just by saying guns are now illegal how will they enforce it? Perhaps in Chicago as an example.

how_things_are_done_in_the_united_states_of_muri

16 posted on 04/02/2018 12:20:48 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So this little **** wants a popular vote to repeal not a law, but the acknowledgment of our God given rights. What about when the people of California, by popular vote declined to support same sex marriage? Popular vote didn’t matter so much then, did it?


17 posted on 04/02/2018 12:20:52 PM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Bill of Rights was established as a set of restraints on the government to make it unlawful for government to infringe on our already existing rights. Our rights do not come from government, nor from the Constitution, nor from the Bill of Rights. They come from God. They are Natural Rights.

If the leftist, America-haters can get 2/3rds of the Congress to propose a repeal of the 2nd Amendment, and then get 3/4ths of the States to ratify such a repeal, that would take away the legal restraints against government to be sure. But we still have those rights, no matter what, because, to repeat, our rights come from God.

The only difference will be, if the 2nd were ever to be repealed, that we will live in VERY interesting times.


18 posted on 04/02/2018 12:22:13 PM PDT by Jay W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

It wasn’t just former Justice Stevens either. There were op Ed’s in USAToday and Salon calling for the same thing and several interviewed at the gun grabber march and a recent youguv poll showed 39% of Democrats want to repeal the 2nd Amendment. This is not some fringe position for them. A large swathe of their party believes in it.


19 posted on 04/02/2018 12:23:32 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kempster

Too many Ivy League justices. We need some from non-Eastern schools, some that have actually owned guns, that have done more than sit on some judicial bench. Maybe some that grew up and lived outside of urban areas.


20 posted on 04/02/2018 12:25:54 PM PDT by Reno89519 (If Trump can't deliver and folds like a typical Republican, maybe he should be impeached.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson