It’s only the left (i.e., Media Matters) doing it though.
ESPN’s Jemele Hill Attempts to Make Laura Ingraham Boycott Racial
Those companies who pulled ads from Laura Ingraham’s show over her comment about David Hogg being rejected by colleges show no fear of those who support the 2nd Amendment that might not appreciate this.
Joy Reid was gloating over this on her MSNBC show yesterday,
Ingraham not on her show this week.
As usual, conservatives do nothing to push back on these social media bullies.
How many people have called her advertisers or cancelled accounts to voice support for Ingrahm?
Dangerous?
I think we will soon be approaching boycott exhaustion, where it just won’t matter.
So many causes for PC offense, so hard to keep up with, so little time.
It would be very dangerous for the lefty media if we wise up and do the same thing to one of them when they say something outrageous. And then we do it to another one. And another one.
I understand the need to at times have a woman in front of the audience, but honestly they are not of the make up to go on the offensive against the Left.
Cattiness and female passive-aggressiveness are not going to discredit and disqualify the Left if we allow the left to dominate the moral level of this conflict.
This is a guy that understands. He must remember the Chick-fil-a “boycott” and how that ended up.
What dangerous is the naivety of Corporate American falling time and again for these computer bot driven PR “boycott” campaigns.
Leftists pressure groups use computer bots programs to generate thousands of fake emails. Politician have gotten wise and know how to screen out these but Corp America still is falling for this garbage.
it time for the Right to stop playing with kid gloves and destroy these Leftist clown shows at their own game.
This kid is an 18 year old snot nosed punk, who doesn’t know a damn thing about life. Who the hell is he to call for boycotts etc. It’s about time that he gets some push back.
First of all could the reason Florida GOP pols like Rubio and Scott are not pushing for investigations into the failed security policies in Parkland which also had anything but high scholastic standards. Are refusing to do so are because of big money law suits springing up ?
Many of those advertisers are foreign based like Bayer and Nestles which are Swiss owned. Those headquartered in Europe get their news and corporate big shots formulate their corporate points of view from our media which is anti Trump.
I wonder the accounts actually moved to a more general category. Could be a lot of over wrought theater going on here.
Yes it is dangerous. Dangerous to the profits and financial stability of those companies supportive of the filthy mouthed anti-Trump Hogg. Those companies deserve whatever blowback their action (withdrawing from the Ingraham show) for political reasons befalls them. The polling news on Drudge today shows Trump with 50% popularity. That means potentially a LOT of voters and consumers disagree with corporate leftism. They went that way, now they can deal with the blowback.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy
He's admitted he wasn't even there but got there as fast as he could.
In a rare moment of clarity, liberal mouth breather realized that boycotts can work against them too.