1 posted on
04/01/2018 7:40:01 PM PDT by
Jyotishi
To: Jyotishi
2 posted on
04/01/2018 7:47:48 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: Jyotishi
Lo fo article. Waste of time. Tells of nothing about nothing.
Never heard of the place, the cardinal nor the land deal, nor this court. Cat box liner.
3 posted on
04/01/2018 7:57:14 PM PDT by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed/Academia = farm team for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)
To: Jyotishi
Bring back the inquisitions!
/s
4 posted on
04/01/2018 8:04:19 PM PDT by
BipolarBob
(Keep the guns, ban the liberals.)
To: Jyotishi
Might agree that the ‘Law of God’ is above the law of the land. But, that is a whole different proposition.
5 posted on
04/01/2018 8:32:21 PM PDT by
oldplayer
To: Jyotishi
God...Family...Country...Church
6 posted on
04/01/2018 9:08:24 PM PDT by
super7man
(Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting)
To: Jyotishi
7 posted on
04/01/2018 10:07:08 PM PDT by
publius911
(Declaration: MSM, I am so over watching or listening to bald perverts, thugs and sluts)
To: Jyotishi
Law of church above law of land: Cardinal George AlencherryIn that direction, Sharia Law lies.
8 posted on
04/01/2018 10:10:05 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(What America needs is more Hogg control.)
To: Jyotishi
In the supreme ultimate moral and spiritual sense yes G-d above secular law. But in the practical sense, meanwhile as far as society and government, secular law is what we follow as much as we must follow secular law. We may morally & spiritual take our lumps for not following secular law. That does not remove us from taking those lumps, it only makes our statement before G-d about which law we see as higher.
9 posted on
04/02/2018 6:36:36 AM PDT by
Wuli
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson