Sounds to me like the WaPo got it right for once.
So it’s all about the oil unless it *could* be about the oil, but only if the oil isn’t about the oil unless it should be about the oil. That about it?
they always commit the fallacy of too few alternatives. Maybe Iran will have a change of government?? It seems to be happening.
“The Psychomyopic Democrat” - Defining a Democrat.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1627860/posts
Still true!
BULLSH*T!
has all the sand and rubble covered Obama’s red lines. Maybe we can discover where he left them
The Kurds should trade the oil for what they can get. Their positions aren’t defensible in the long run anyway.
The Sunnis are SA’s problem.
And the whole Mideast is China’s problem now. Why should we do China’s dirty work?
Syria’s not exactly known for its oil.
And here I thought these BASTARDS thought we were evil for just contemplating keeping the oil.
You know,
NO BLOOD FOR OIL.
Ridiculous
As if Iran doesnt have oil
Assad is still in power. The oil is going to Russia - that’s why they’re ‘helping’ Assad. And besides, we don’t need to be in Syria. Jordan’s much nicer and closer to the beach.
Syria doesn’t have all that much oil. On the lists of oil reserves it ranks #32. Just above Argentina.
Iran having a military presence (directly and/or thru their Hezballah murder gang or other proxies) in Syria is a grave danger to begin with, that must be removed. Letting Iran also control any more oil is a second extremely undesirable thing that we should not allow, imho. Iran is under very dangerous rule right now... and USA remains their number one target.... letting them have access to the Mediterranean through Syria is a direct line into Europe, too...another extremely undesirable outcome if we give them Syria the way we apparently abandoned much of Iraq to them
Iran has huge oil reserves. Syria does not. Rogin is NeoCon/Deep State trash.