You know, it’s really okay to excerpt the salient points of the article, only.
Right or wrong, most readers aren’t going to click the link to read the whole thing.
I know I struggled with what to put in the excerpt, but for those who want to read the whole article it is here.
If you want, you can start reading at "The Birth of the Collusion Thesis" but it's still a long read.
If you're seriously interested in the topic and you need facts and a timeline to debate the opposition, this article is good for reference material.
When you have the time it's worth the read and worth saving or bookmarking.
If Comey had followed the letter of the law, the trail of guilt may have led all the way to Obama himself.
But give Comey his due. If he had followed the letter of the law, the trail of guilt may have led all the way to Obama himself. As Andrew C. McCarthy has demonstrated at National Review Online, Obama used a dummy email account to communicate with Clinton via her private server. Did this make Obama complicit in Clintons malfeasance? Anyone in Comeys position would have thought twice before moving to prosecute her and not only because the case might have ensnared the president himself. The FBI must enforce the law, but it must also be seen to be enforcing it. As a rule, these two imperatives buttress each other. During the 2016 election, Comey faced extraordinary circumstances. If he had followed the law to the letter, he would have toppled the leading candidate for president and decapitated the Democratic party.
Clintons supporters, more than 50 percent of the electorate, would have erupted in outrage, screaming that a politicized FBI had thrown the election to Donald Trump.
Guarding the bureaus reputation for impartiality is a serious concern. But it is nevertheless a thoroughly political concern. Comey would have us believe that it was a unique moment in his career, the singular entry into the political arena of an otherwise apolitical servant of the law.
Truth be told, Comey loves being in the thick of it, but not because he is a partisan brawler. He is not. It is the drama that he relishes the grand stage. His favorite role is that of Joe Friday, the no-nonsense lawman, the guardian of legal processes before the encroachments of dirty politicians.
Joe Friday, however, was a simple detective, a confirmed bachelor, content to live quietly with his mother and his parakeet. And, of course, he was a TV fiction. In real life, humble straight shooters get clobbered with a brick before they ever reach the limelight. In real life, snagging the big part often requires the equivalent of leaving a bloody horsehead in the producers bed.
Some interesting insight into Comey's worldview...
ACTUALLY.... in this case, it would be very difficult to excerpt the ‘salient points’, and it really does require going to the link and reading the full article.
I only found one paragraph that gave an overall description. Here it is.
“Once the enablers of Hillary Clinton compromised their own integrity, they internalized her program of denial and projection. Their own egos are now invested in perpetuating it. To avoid owning up to their shortcomings, they insist, in ever-shriller tones, on the personal integrity of the super spy and the credibility of his reports. The mere acknowledgement of a simple truth that the dossier is junk would constitute an admission either of deep professional malfeasance or of gob-smacking gullibility.”