Posted on 03/29/2018 4:56:59 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
Mike Rowe Bemoans the ‘Epidemic of Fatherlessness’ Notes that majority of school shooters are fatherless SHARE TWEET EMAIL Mike Rowe / Screenshot BY: 12:57 pm
Mike Rowe, best known as the host of the Discovery Channel series "Dirty Jobs," took to Facebook on Tuesday to bemoan the "epidemic of fatherlessness," which he said affects every level of society.
While discussing an anti-bullying program for his web series, "Returning the Favor," Rowe considered the connection between the rates of fatherless children and the societal ills of bullying, poor educational achievement, homelessness, suicide, and violence.
Citing statistics, Rowe argued in a Facebook post that children, especially young men, who grow up in homes without a father are at a distinct disadvantage.
The facts seem pretty clear.
• 63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes – 5 times the average. (US Dept. Of Health/Census) • 90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes – 32 times the average. • 85% of all children who show behavior disorders come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Center for Disease Control) • 80% of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes – 14 times the average. (Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26) • 71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (National Principals Association Report) • 43% of US children live without their father [US Department of Census]
Rowe noted that, like bullying, the majority of school shootings are perpetrated by individuals from fatherless homes.
"Is it really so surprising to learn that a majority of bullies also come from fatherless homes?" Rowe asked. "As do a majority of school shooters? As do a majority of older male shooters?"
Rowe admitted that the topic is controversial and likely not to earn him many fans among those who seek a one-dimensional solution to the problems plaguing young men.
"I know this is controversial," he wrote. "I'm sorry to inject an uncomfortable element into a post about a ‘feel-good' show, but I think it's important to consider the possibility that this thing we like to call ‘an epidemic of bullying,' is really an ‘epidemic of fatherlessness.'"
Rowe also pointed to the fact that society and social media provide males, regardless of age, with a convoluted and conflicted message about masculinity.
"It's reasonable to conclude that our society is sending a message to men of all ages that is decidedly mixed," Rowe wrote. "On the one hand, we're telling them to ‘man-up' whenever the going gets tough. On the other, we're condemning a climate of ‘toxic masculinity' at every turn."
He argued that it is difficult enough for young men with a stable family support structure to distinguish what is expected of them from society, let alone those without a present father figure.
"If that strikes you as confusing, imagine being a 14-year-old boy with no father figure to help you make sense of it," he added.
Rowe did not dismiss the seriousness of bullying, but attempted to paint it as a symptom of the disintegration of family support structures. He lambasted efforts to blame societal ills on "social media," "guns," or genetic deviations, arguing that such excuses only serve to disguise the problem at hand.
"The bullying crisis is real, but the root cause has nothing to do with video games, or guns, or social media, or rock and roll, or sugary drinks, or any of the other boogymen currently in fashion," Rowe said. "Nor is it a function of some new chromosome unique to the current crop of kids coming of age."
Rowe said that the children of recent generations are not radically different from those that preceded them; rather it is "the parents who have changed."
"Kids are the same now as they were a hundred years ago—petulant, brave, arrogant, earnest, frightened, and cocksure," he wrote. "It's the parents who have put their own happiness above the best interests of their kids."
Such sentiment has resulted, Rowe claimed, in a generation of parents who have abdicated their responsibilities to raise well-adjusted children, opting instead to allow the community to play an ever-increasing role.
"It's the parents who actually believe ‘the village' will raise their kids," Rowe said. "When the village is profoundly incapable of doing anything of the sort."
Kill Shot. (NPI)
There is a link between fatherlessness and bullying; there is nothing I wouldn’t do to prevent my children from being bullied, and fatherless children are missing one of the two parents that would protect them in that manner.
The Sandy Hook Killer murdered his mother before shooting up the school, he did not have a father at home, he was raised by his mother.
Yes, but my response was about the Columbine killers' parents.
The Bastard Boom
There are certainly except, but the fatherless was issue dwarfs anything else.
Incarceration rates. Poverty. Victims of violent crime. The difference in racially measured outcomes is almost entirely accounted for by fatherlesness. There’s still racism, and it still hurts us, it it is waaaaay down the list.
My late Grandfather lost his father around age 8 to cancer. My best friend had his Dad walk out about the same age.
One day, I suddenly realized that those two (separated by over 65 years) had a lot of the same issues. Neither one had any idea of how to be a father, and it showed. Both are royal bastards, but ones who never were told “no” to certain behaviors.
Now my grandfather raised a family successfully, but the emotional scars he had affected my Dad, my Uncle, and their kids. My best friend has four kids, and has had similar issues.
I wonder what would have happened if either of those two men had a father in their lives. Both turned out “OK”, but the damage done to them has rippled out to other generations. When I look at some of the dang near feral children out there now, I shudder. Many of them not only have no idea of what being a father or a man is, they have no check on their behavior.
Even if marriage came back into vogue, it would take four or five generations to repair the damage.
There are certainly exceptions, but the fatherless-ness issue dwarfs anything else.
Incarceration rates. Poverty. Victims of violent crime. The difference in racially measured outcomes is almost entirely accounted for by fatherlesness. There’s still racism, and it still hurts us, it it is waaaaay down the list.
Maybe “fatherless” should be made illegal.
Bingo.
Why doesn’t Mike run for office already?
He’s got a lot more in common with the average American slob than most people on TV.
His stances on most issues seem sane and decent. Why no?
Preach it!
Bookmark
I know you think you know what “literally” means - but it doesn’t literally mean that.Ironic, but true.
What does ‘literally’ mean?
“Literally” has two contradictory meanings. Either
- explicitly exact or (ironically, depending on context)
- the exact opposite of that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.