Actually we do as they constitute part of the definition of “arms”.
Wasserman Schultz is just another Hitler’s Lieutenant marching down the road to fascism.
Its like saying you own your car but not thec car keys.
Bearing arms incldes the ammo for the gun.
Bearing arms included the shot and gunpowder and flints, the Founders didnt separate all that out.
If a silencer is a gun the ammo is too.
Communist doublespeak lawyers.
Well, the upside of this bill might mean that Californica’s “bullet” train will not be built...
Someone please do this poor stupid person a favor and mail her a “bullet”.....They come in all sizes, Debbie! I can walk around all day long with my pockets full of ‘em - so what? They ain’t going no place and they ain’t goin’ ta to do nobody no harm, no how! They goin’ to be the same when I take ‘em out of my pockets at the end of the day as they war when I put ‘em in thar...and they’ll stay on the table all night and go no where and do no harm...
So do your best, you lamebrain knucklehead....
It is telling how ignorant liberals are regarding the meaning of the constitution.
How can you “bear” arms if they are unloaded. You can’t “bear” an unloaded firearm. You can carry it, lug it around and move it. You can’t “bear” it.
Stinking libtards just never stop. It requires constant vigilance and a willingness to be a street fighter to counter their perseverance. I hate that the RINOs constantly cave to them.
Washington D.C. Ammunition Ban Violates Second Amendment
November 8, 2010
Easy AdSense by Unreal
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals has declared D.C.’s ammunition possession ban unconstitutional in the case of Herrington v. District of Columbia.
http://www.islandlawblog.com/washington-d-c-ammunition-ban-violates-second-amendment/
Arms without cartridges are not arms, they are awkward crutches.
Every time I see something like this, it reminds how absolutely vital we keep a conservative majority on the Supreme Court.
Why do they feel the need to bother with “bullet” control? After all, most hard-core gun owners have promised to give the government their bullets first.
If you just look at things the right way, everyone can be happy.
“They never stop do they.”
I’ve noticed long screeds about what the 2nd Amendment means, I saw Cletus’ Fair Use Doctrine argument, and I’ve seen people talk about how guns reduce crime. They are ALL good arguments...if you were in a college debate, or if we were dealing with rational people. But we’re not.
The ONLY argument that they will ever understand goes something like this:
“I have 18 guns. Congress passes a law making 7 of my guns illegal. How many guns do I have?
18. Your move.”
The very simple argument to be used is that there are somewhere between 400 and 600 million guns in this country http://weaponsman.com/?p=33875, likely owned by well over 100 million people. At least 10% are unlikely to EVER give up their guns under any circumstances (except that of their gun being considerably warmer than their rapidly cooling body). IOW, “If you try to take my guns, I will kill you.” Millions agree with that sentiment, and some not-inconsiderable percentage of them will act on it.
Molon labe, bitches!
#@$% them and the horse they rode in on. Absurd , obscene and downright idiotic claptrap from moonbat central (congress.)Will I have to do a background check on myself before I start packing my next 1000 rounds of ammo?