Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Left is showing its cards.
1 posted on 03/27/2018 5:35:56 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: reaganaut1
"In 1939 the Supreme Court unanimously held that Congress could prohibit the possession of a sawed-off shotgun because that weapon had no reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a “well regulated militia.”"

A. Miller never showed
B. What exactly were "trench sweepers"?
C. The author uses the "states rights" interpretation, which was shot down by Heller.

At least the truth comes out, sort of.

61 posted on 03/27/2018 6:12:19 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I fully support the left trying to repeal the 2nd thru a Constitutional amendment. But, they won’t.

What I do not support is the left, a bunch of cowards, doing the equivalent thru unconstitutional means, thru the courts, thru bad law, thru unconstitutional statutes and bureaucratic restrictions and regulations.


64 posted on 03/27/2018 6:15:14 AM PDT by C210N (Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Just axin' a question, do SCOTUS members have armed protection? Of course, the answer is hell yes, the Supreme Court Marshals.

The force itself, currently numbering about 125, is responsible for security of the court building, its inhabitants, and it visitors. Additionally, they provide personal protection to the Justices at all times.

Does stevens want his protection to give up their weapons?

Hell no, he just wants me to give up my protection so some snot nosed little prick named Hogg will feel good.

Piss off/on jps.

65 posted on 03/27/2018 6:16:55 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Kill all mooselimb, terrorist savages, with extreme prejudice! Deus Vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

At least he is calling for it to be done via the amendment process, which is Constitutional.

The Left usually achieves such ends via slimy underhanded tricks.


66 posted on 03/27/2018 6:19:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
The tactic being used in this 'march' is called “Weaponized Empathy” and it’s one of the Left’s most effective tools. It’s also pure evil.

What is Weaponized Empathy? It's when you use people's morals and empathy to manipulate them into serving your own political agenda. It's basically an advanced kind of guilt-tripping designed to get people who really do care about others to vote for their own enslavement.

Guns kill children! We need to do everything we can to get rid of guns! Don't you agree? What? Do you want to see kids murdered? You don't hate little children, do you? I know you're a caring person and you would never want to see children die. Surely you don't have a problem with just a little sensible gun control, right? You're a good person, right?

It's a bit like using love to get a partner to go along with something they really do not want to do. "If you really loved me, you'd let me do it."

67 posted on 03/27/2018 6:20:26 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

And there it is. We knew it was coming. But Oh they said we’re all just freaking out for nothing cause nobody is trying to take away our guns. Uh huh. We’re not idiots. We could see the writing on the wall.


68 posted on 03/27/2018 6:23:51 AM PDT by kelly4c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Remember...Stevens was nominated by Gerald Ford - GOPe
69 posted on 03/27/2018 6:23:58 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
"Rarely in my lifetime have I seen the type of civic engagement schoolchildren and their supporters demonstrated in Washington and other major cities throughout the country this past Saturday. These demonstrations demand our respect. They reveal the broad public support for legislation..."

Yeesh, when start off with a paragraph this wrong, you know it's going to be a doozy.

1. Rallies do not show evidence of public support.
2. The 2006 nationwide pro-illegal rallies were much more impressive.
3. Nothing about that rally demands any more "respect" from the Right than the Left gives to the annual March for Life anti-abortion rally in D.C.

70 posted on 03/27/2018 6:24:17 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Another retarded ‘legal scholar’ who doesn’t understand the difference between the National Guard and a militia in the sense that the Founders meant.


74 posted on 03/27/2018 6:28:07 AM PDT by jarwulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
In 1939 the Supreme Court unanimously held that Congress could prohibit the possession of a sawed-off shotgun because that weapon had no reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a “well regulated militia.”

Except in 2018 the US military uses short barrel shotguns. So I doubt the Trump SC would agree. (As a matter of fact, thanks to Obama's BATF, in 2018 you can buy a short barrel not-a-shotgun, without additional NFA paperwork.)


75 posted on 03/27/2018 6:32:08 AM PDT by Sooth2222 (Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Typical Libtards Overreach.


76 posted on 03/27/2018 6:33:12 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Is it proper for a Supreme Court justice to be saying things like this when his job is to uphold the Constitution?

Should Justice Stevens now be recused (forcefully) from any case before the court that concerns guns or the 2A?

77 posted on 03/27/2018 6:33:49 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Remember this when this 97-year-old fart finally, mercifully kicks the bucket. I'm sure there'll be the usual platitudes and mourning, but people should remember what a terrible joke of judge he was on the Supreme Court.

I mean seriously, read this, and remember he was sitting on the Court during its District of Columbia v. Heller decision. It's infuriating. He may be recycling his already-stated opinions, but it's clear he's doing so again at an opportunistic time.

82 posted on 03/27/2018 6:38:17 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

IF they can repeal the 2nd based on false stats, fear mongering and “for the children”, all the rest can be repealed using the same method.


84 posted on 03/27/2018 6:39:58 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

At least he admits that the 2nd Amendment was created as a defense against standing armies.

Notice that he does not promote getting rid of a standing army...only the 2nd amendment.

To me, they go part and parcel. Can’t do one without the other.


86 posted on 03/27/2018 6:43:09 AM PDT by sdthree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

This is an extremely important admission from a former Supreme Court Justice!

The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting, or home protection. It was created to protect ourselves from a standing army controlled by the Federal government.

He calls the 2nd a relic of our past. And, yet, here we are with the largest, most technologically advanced standing army that the United States has ever had. If anything, the 2nd is more important today than ever before.


87 posted on 03/27/2018 6:45:49 AM PDT by sdthree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

“These demonstrations demand our respect.”


This guy is a special kind of stupid.

No, the Bill of Rights demands respect. We don’t need to respect the voices of children being manipulated by the left.

Come and take them, Sally!


88 posted on 03/27/2018 6:47:34 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
He says, "Overturning that decision via a constitutional amendment to get rid of the Second Amendment would be simple".

Yeah....how hard could it be?

(roll eyes)

92 posted on 03/27/2018 6:53:01 AM PDT by Simon Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The sentiments of those in power toward repealing the right to bear arms is exactly why the 2nd Amendment is so critically important.


94 posted on 03/27/2018 6:55:09 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberals, go find another country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
In 1939 the Supreme Court unanimously held that Congress could prohibit the possession of a sawed-off shotgun because that weapon had no reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a “well regulated militia.”

based on a lie. In oral arguments before the court, the government lied (surprise!) and said sawed off shotguns are not used by the military, when in fact they had been used to great effect in WWI in the trenches of France.

95 posted on 03/27/2018 6:59:55 AM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson