Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Veto This Bill, Mr. President — It’s An Establishment Trap
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | March 22, 2018 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 03/22/2018 1:59:50 PM PDT by Kaslin

RUSH: So yet another esteemed member of the journalism community is suggesting that the Mueller investigation shut down. It’s Daniel Henninger at the Wall Street Journal. He believes that it should shut down because it’s on the verge of destroying virtual systems, virtual systematic destruction.

This takes me to what I think of this… I guess this is what I think of this omnibus budget bill. We’ve had two hours here of dealing with it. I have taken more calls than usual today because a lot of people are fit to be tied over it and wanted to weigh in, wanted to unburden themselves. And I wanted to see what the cross-section of callers we would get thought, even though I can’t lay claim to it being scientific. I don’t take enough calls for that.

But I purposely avoided giving you my solid opinion on this, and the reason for that is I didn’t want to shape any other opinion. And I’ve noted that in the total number of calls we took, there were two, if I’m not mistaken — maybe three, but it would be in more than that. Two calls for certain from people who essentially said, “Leave Trump out of this. This isn’t Trump, and we can’t undermine Trump. This is only Trump’s second year now, and it’s unrealistic to expect the draining of the swamp to be happening rapidly” and so forth.

This deal is so egregious that it has everybody angry, but the thing about it is it’s par for the course. It really isn’t anything new. It’s just a longer period of time. Most of these things we’ve been getting in two-month, three-month increments as continuing resolutions. This is just being called omnibus ’cause it’s like a giant Christmas tree with anybody in Congress being able to put any present under that tree that they want. But I believe there are some things that no matter what have not changed, and it’s why I asked if anybody had heard from any of the Never Trumpers on this.

And we haven’t.

Well, if we have, I haven’t yet seen it. You know, some of the Never Trumpers live and write in obscurity. They live on blog posts, and sometimes they tweet out there. And it takes other people finding their blog posts and tweets and then amplifying them. But I haven’t seen much. Now, if Trump were nowhere around, if Trump had not won, the Never Trumper crowd would be as opposed to this as you are. Maybe.

Maybe not as you are, but they would be opposed to it. But you notice they’re not in the chorus yet of people lining up criticizing this. I think one thing has not changed — among many things, but there is one thing that remains constant — and it is this. The Washington establishment still dislikes Donald Trump and doesn’t want to have to deal with him and doesn’t want him succeeding and doesn’t want him anywhere around.

And I believe — and we will never be able to prove this. We never be able to say it with even ontological certitude. But I think part of this ungodly, over-the-top omnibus spending bill is in part designed by Washington establishment types to do damage to Donald Trump. I think the Never Trumpers in Congress and the Washington establishment types blew this bill up to this inordinate size in hopes that they could cause some blame for it to accrue to Donald Trump.

To weaken Trump in the eyes of his supporters. To make some of his supporters think that Trump is not gonna succeed, that Trump can’t drain the swamp, that Trump cannot really take on the establishment and win. Because, look! The establishment’s writing their ticket here, and they’re getting everything they want, and Trump is not getting much of anything he wants except defense spending and a little pittance toward his wall.

In other words, they know you’re gonna be fit to be tied over this. But they’ve been there and done that. McConnell and Ryan and these guys have been there forever. Trump is in his second year! This is not about Trump, and they’re trying to make it about Trump. This is the congressional side of the establishment asserting itself and essentially saying, “We don’t care that you elected Trump. We know what his election means to you. But look at what we’re doing anyway.” And even if it means some of them don’t win reelection, they are still going to remain in good standing and in high favor with other members of the establishment.

Like Andrew McCabe and James Comey will forever remain icons and heroes to the people in the establishment because of their valiant efforts to get rid of Donald Trump. So even if some Republicans and Democrats lose reelection because of this omnibus spending bill — and they’re probably figuring they won’t ’cause this is March and the election is not ’til November and you’ll forget it by then — they want you to blame Trump for this.

They want you to see or think that Trump is powerless.

They want you to become that nobody can drain the swamp. Because if Trump can’t do it, who else will ever be able to? Well, I firmly believe that part of this — and I don’t know how much, in terms of the spending. But I believe part of this is designed to blow you up, to make you mad and to hopefully make you wobbly on Trump. ‘Cause this is pretty drastic. Folks, this is black and white here. Over here you’ve got Trump the insurgent outsider who is still hated, despised; they still want him gone. If this were any other Republican president and they were trying this Republican cheating-with-the-Russians scam…

If they tried this on George W. Bush, for example, the Republican leadership, House and Senate, would be fit to be tied over this, and we wouldn’t be hearing the end of it. But since it’s Trump, they’re willing to stand aside, let Mueller have his way under the guise that he’s the most brilliant person to run the investigation. Greatest reputation you could get! Smartest guy, great integrity, all of that. Anybody else they tried this on, they wouldn’t have this smooth sailing with the effort. Because this just doesn’t… This doesn’t compute. These people that ran for office on the Republican side got elected. They know. From the Tea Party on, they know what’s important to you, to Republican voters.

Their behavior isn’t much different. I mean, they continue to campaign on saying things you want to hear, but when it comes time to govern, that kind of vanishes or disappears. “But, Rush, but, Rush, Trump’s going along with it. Paul Ryan said Trump’s gonna go along with it.” Yeah. ‘Cause there’s some stuff that Trump desperately wants, but I actually think that Trump should veto this. I think that is the great equalizer here.

As I say, Ryan and McConnell and both parties leadership, they’ve been there, they’ve been in that town for who knows how long. This is their doing. This isn’t Trump’s doing. This isn’t Trump’s budget. Trump submitted a budgets earlier this year. This isn’t his budget. In fact, this isn’t even a spending bill. This is a borrowing bill because we don’t have any money. This is the omnibus borrowing bill of 2018. There’s one thing that has saved Washington, quote, unquote, saved Washington in all of this.

Normally when government so overspends way beyond what is commonsensical, well, one of the things that reins that in is that if government sops up all of the money that’s out there to be borrowed, there isn’t any left for the private sector. So there’s no money for investment in a small business or a development here, there, whatever, because government’s taken all the money, and then government can print what it needs. But interest rates for so long having been at zero has kind of eliminated that restraint on government borrowing.

So they’ve been permitted to spend wildly, even more crazily than ever with interest rates because the amount of debt or capital that they’re soaking up, private sector, is not as much as it would be if there were higher interest rates or higher service on the debt charges. So that’s one of the things that has prevented this kind of massive spending have having a genuine real negative impact in the private sector.

So I don’t think anything’s changed. I think the establishment still wants Trump gone, as much now as ever. In fact, maybe more so now than ever because he has survived every attempt they have thrown at him. I think their frustration continues to mount, their anger continues to mount. Don’t forget, I have it on the highest authority that all of these intelligence community people and the media and this whole cabal pushing this Trump-Russia collusion business, I have it on good authority that the people in that movement literally thought that they would have gotten rid of Trump inside of six months.

And we’re now into month 15, and the frustration and anger these people feel at not being able to run this guy out of town or to force you to want him to be run out of time has them doubly committed to getting this done. And what better way to assert the power and the dominance of the establishment versus Trump than to present some gigantic, inexplicable, insulting omnibus spending bill that doesn’t even really advance Republican ideas. And to them the icing on the cake would be you getting mad at Trump for it and you seeing Trump as a failure in his primary objective of changing Washington and draining swamp.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Quickly in Detroit, Richard, great to have you with us on the program today. How are you doing?

CALLER: Good, Mr. Limbaugh. As a mature gentleman of your vintage, it’s not my custom to blow sunshine up people’s skirts, but I did want to commend you on your analysis of the true reason behind this so-called budget bill here. I thought it was brilliant. In the 20 years or so that I’ve been listening to you this is easily in the top 10, maybe in the top five.

RUSH: Really?

CALLER: Yes, sir. Seriously. And I wanted to commend you for that. And I’m hoping personally that when Mr. Trump sits down with the assassins from the Congress and looks at steaming pile on the table there in front of him that he realizes that he is on the menu. And I’m really hoping that he understands that and that somebody puts a bug in his ear about this and that he says, “No, no, no.”

RUSH: Well, there is precedent. Ronald Reagan vetoed some just outrageously exorbitant spending deals when the Republicans didn’t have 60 votes in the Senate. In fact, Reagan was the president that took a budget proposal one year up to the Capitol for his State of the Union. I think he did it at the State of the Union. And it was stacked so high he needed two people just to bring it up there just to demonstrate how ridiculous it was, how large.

This omnibus borrowing bill is 2200 pages, folks. I mean, the guys voting on this today have no idea what all it says. Whoever is voting on this, House has already voted, Senate’s gonna vote, they don’t know what’s all in this. It is literally like a Christmas tree, and you don’t know everything under the tree when you get up on Christmas morning, but they’re able to give themselves the presents.

My analysis is, if you missed it, that what Richard thinks is top five historical analysis is this thing is so over the top that I really think it’s the swamp versus Trump. And they’ve done this trying to make it look like it doesn’t matter that Trump’s there, that he can’t stop this, he can’t drain the swamp, he doesn’t have anything.

They want you mad at Trump. They want you blaming Trump for this. This is the establishment flexing its muscles, showing what they can still do. And it doesn’t matter who we elect as president there. But I think this is in part an effort on the part of the — ’cause remember these guys in Congress, on the Republican and Democrat side, have been there for years. This is not Trump’s budget. This whole thing is not about Trump.

They’re trying to make it about Trump. They want you to think electing Trump was meaningless, it isn’t gonna do anything. If Trump can’t stop this, what’s he worth, that’s what they want you thinking as a result of this. The added bonus is that they get all the spending.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: omnibus; rushlive; rushtranscript; spendingbill; swampspendingbill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Kaslin

This is written by globalists and by people who aren’t even running this year with the express purpose of making us mad at the GOP so that Democrats win the House at least and maybe the Senate, so that they can then im the peaches.

A veto may do some mischief but not nearly as much as signing this POS bill.


41 posted on 03/22/2018 3:40:03 PM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is Trumps LAST CHANCE to live up to those who elected him by VETOing this monstrosity. If he does not then it is the end of his MAGA plan.


42 posted on 03/22/2018 3:41:57 PM PDT by TonyM (UPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All


Less Than $1.1k To Go!!
Your Monthly and Quarterly
Donations Help To Keep FR
From Being "Erased"
By Remembering NOW
To Donate!!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


43 posted on 03/22/2018 3:44:42 PM PDT by musicman (The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyM

That’s the way I see it, as well.
This has everything Schumer and Pelosi want, and very little that Trump and we want. Signing this is the end of MAGA, and turns DJT into a one term speck in history.


44 posted on 03/22/2018 3:46:55 PM PDT by Fireone (Lock Her Up! (and 100 of her accomplices))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cranked

My opinion also. If they override a veto. It is on them.


45 posted on 03/22/2018 3:50:58 PM PDT by dforest (Never let a Muslim cut your hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He seems resigned to signing it...
<

@realDonaldTrump
20h20 hours ago
~~
Got $1.6 Billion to start Wall on Southern Border, rest will be forthcoming.
Most importantly, got $700 Billion to rebuild our Military, $716 Billion next year...most ever.
Had to waste money on Dem giveaways in order to take care of military pay increase and new equipment.


46 posted on 03/22/2018 4:19:15 PM PDT by kanawa (Trump Loves a Great Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

I don’t see where planned parenthood has been DEFUNDED??? The evangelicals came out in droves for Trump he NEEDS to address this!!!!


47 posted on 03/22/2018 4:25:25 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ted Cruz is already promising to vote against this latest Omnibus (how about a REAL budget for once????). If Trump cannot veto this Omnibus, he will lose at least half of his incredible momentum... and for what, exactly? He MUST veto this bill.


48 posted on 03/22/2018 4:29:56 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

It will be a tribute to Ivanka.


49 posted on 03/22/2018 4:40:10 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (60 in '18.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC
WHY on earth would Trump even consider signing off on this huge mess of a bill? Did he read it?

Probably not because it hasn't even gone thru the Senate yet........sheesh!

50 posted on 03/22/2018 5:04:13 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (My cat is not fat, she is just big boned........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cranked
Don't think I could possibly agree more! Did they learn NOTHING from Obamacare?!

Oh wait, it's Congress I'm talking about ... NEVERMIND!

VETO THE BILL PRESIDENT TRUMP --- IT'S A TRAP!

51 posted on 03/22/2018 5:05:44 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

OK OK. I will be the first to say that I am putting lipstick on a pig, but, we may be facing two wars within his first term (NK and Iran, not to mention keeping China and Russia in Check) and he knows as well as our adversaries know, that the military may not be up to the task with regard to parts, maintenance, readiness etc. he may have to bite this one for national security reasons. I know it sucks, but which would you rather have. He’s one guy and Congress is Congress. Like it or not, it is what it is. I’m about 80/20 on a veto, but have a concern it may be about military $$.


52 posted on 03/22/2018 5:19:04 PM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This bill is a disaster.


53 posted on 03/22/2018 7:01:19 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

To: txrefugee

Schumer and Pelosi are daring him to veto it so that if the government shuts down, they won’t get blamed. Then the whole apparatus goes on spin cycle.


55 posted on 03/22/2018 8:45:29 PM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

1. He put himself in this position.

2. He can easily get himself out of it. VETO it. With, prejudice. And then take the bill apart, one special-pork project at a time. Starting with Schumer’s tunnel to nowhere. Go thru it, line by line, talking Planned Parenthood, ICE/Border Patrol-and feel free to bring up the Oakland mayor warning felons...California being a, Sanctuary State, defying federal law...how cities in Cali are suing the state, not to be part of the state program.

Then, go on to say that in the interest of being the steward of the people’s money and the fact that “THEY” want to hold the US military hostage to this bill, we’ll just have to manage our defense budget a little better, until this bill is fixed and move some money around.

He could crush them, in a matter of minutes and then unleash a Twitter storm, the likes of which, have never been seen. Just have someone go thru the bill and start talking about all the bad stuff, with hyper-links to the section and page.

He would absolutely own them. But, I think he’s all about it, because he thinks this proves the, Art of the Deal.


56 posted on 03/23/2018 12:23:31 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti

If he signs it, they all have cover, as it rests solely on him.

If he vetoes it and they’re forced to do an ‘Override Vote’ they have no cover. If they vote to override the veto, then they’ll have some explaining to do with their constituents. And that, they do not want to do.


57 posted on 03/23/2018 12:29:58 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There will never be a wall. Trump has folded at every chance to fight for it.


58 posted on 03/23/2018 12:30:49 AM PDT by Dagnabitt (Point at the Q-Tards and Laugh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Pass and sign this bill and i will NEVER vote for another republican.
Too many broken small gub mint LIES.


59 posted on 03/23/2018 12:36:30 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (vote GOP? Why? McConnell and Ryan are horse shit, gop is dem lite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ripnbang

We could wipe both of them off the map in a week if we wanted to. Aren’t the Norks wanting to meet with the President?

Since Clinton, when the US military went to war, they’ve done it ‘surgically’. Being careful not to destroy too much stuff, just enough to try and make the other guys give up. Hasn’t worked. If we sent a devastating force, like we did in WW2, most of this would be done, in no time.

If war with either one has to happen, launch some Tomahawks at their Parliament buildings, when they’re in session, talking about defeating the Great Satan.

If he gets on tv and talks about how the Dem’s and the GOPe are holding the military hostage, a lot of votes start to change.


60 posted on 03/23/2018 12:37:17 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson