Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
Spoken like a true Russian troll farm bot. How's your weather there, comrade DL?

Attempting to portray me as a Russian troll is a poor way to rebut the obvious fact that New York and it's assorted Plutocrats more or less control the news in this nation, and their money influences a great deal of the makeup of congress through their contributions.

New York has an outsized influence in the direction of the nation. It has established connections to the eternal state in Washington DC, and it uses those connections and influence to advance it's policy preferences regardless of whether or not they are actually in the best interest of the country as a whole.

And to accomplish this influence, that is why they control the news.

76 posted on 03/26/2018 6:30:19 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
DiogenesLamp: "...the obvious fact that New York and it's assorted Plutocrats more or less control the news in this nation, and their money influences a great deal of the makeup of congress through their contributions."

The New York metropolitan area is roughly 100 miles squared (1/3 of 1% of US territory) holds about 25 million people (8% of total) and produces a GDP of $2 trillion (11% of total).
It is the largest US metropolitan area, by far, but still at least 90% of the US is not New York.

Does New York exercise undue media & political influence?
Maybe, but that depends on your definitions of "New York", "media" and "undue influence".
Consider, does Mark Levin "broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building" in New York constitute New York media?
What about Limbaugh broadcasting from Florida, Savage from San Francisco or Beck from Dallas?
They all go through New York at some point, so is that "undue influence"?

Oh but, you might say, far more people watch the Left's media than listen to conservatives like Levin, right?
And whose fault, exactly, is that, New York's?
And isn't the Left's media central Hollywood, not New York?

And how exactly did "New York" influence Republican Moore voters in Alabama or Saccone voters in Pittsburgh to stay home?
Did Mitch McConnell (Kentucky) or Paul Ryan (Wisconsin) broadcast secretly from "New York" to make Republicans stay home?

The truth here is that about half of Americans live in larger cities, those are mostly Democrats, and half live in suburbs, smaller towns or rural areas, mostly Republicans.
Democrats may indeed pay a lot of attention to "New York media", but Republicans not so much, unless genuinely conservative.


87 posted on 03/27/2018 3:36:23 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson