Posted on 03/19/2018 8:45:54 AM PDT by a little elbow grease
This article is based on the thinnest of evidence. And one should never forget that very little of what mark bradman predicts actually comes to pass.
Forget about jails, “treason” is a “hangable” offense.
Remember, the news or so called news we get is usually about two weeks to a month behind the actual events. IOW the insiders and perps knew about it at least that much in advance. Foreign policy, domestic policy all same same GI.
Sure, I'm impatient!
Horowitz back ground from the start, has been a white hat unfortunately he has to report to Rosenstein, who is a black hat. At CTH they are sold on Sessions being a white hat, but if he isn’t, then his “prosecutor” could just be a associate proficient in stall tactics. If no one is indicted real soon, Trump will have CONgress to the dems. Its a race against the 2018 elections. BTW if you are not a full blown coolaid drinking, butt kissing, sheeple, don’t bother posting a opposing opinion at CTH. Sundance does some excellent investigated reporting, but opposing views are not wanted there.
Absolutely correct on all points, particularly that sundunce immediately has his fascist admins ban and remove any dissenting viewpoints. That, in itself, should give one pause.
While it occasionally looks like brilliance, unfortunately most of bradmans insights and predictions seldom come to pass. And then when it doesnt happen, crickets. He NEVER addresses his repeated failures. They just disappear into the ether black hole like they had never occurred.
Perhaps if CTH allowed and encouraged diverse opinions, like FR, bradman wouldnt look like a fool so often .
Think about it:
1. These losers didn't even protest this loudly when James Comey was fired -- and Comey was fired directly by their mortal enemy President Trump!
2. I'm willing to bet 90% of the American public didn't even know who Andrew McCabe was until after he was fired. Why would these prominent Obama stooges engage in such a loud, public protest over someone who was a nobody in the public's eyes?
3. They've turned the justifiable -- no, the inevitable -- firing of a crooked FBI agent into a political issue. This clearly means there are no facts on McCabe's side that would ever stand up to objective scrutiny.
4. They've also tried to construct an "obstruction of justice" angle to this firing, even though McCabe hasn't worked in any capacity for the FBI for months. Really? LOL.
5. Related to several prior points ... In the minds of McCabe's supporters, what exactly would have been the upside (in the larger scheme of things) to keeping him the FBI for two more days? All of this public cacophony over some guy's $60,000/year pension? Please. LOL.
In other words ... f this was really just a case of a career FBI guy being fired unjustifiably, these people are all raising holy hell at a time when they'd be better off keeping their mouths shut.
1. He's got a role in all this. Or ...
2. He's 73 years old and is so far past his prime he really has nothing substantive to offer.
Sessions has said he has already appointed an outside prosecutor some time ago. This is not something that he is going to do, but something have has already done.
And he specified that the person he appointed has is outside of Washington but has years of DOJ experience.
I don't know who it is but Rudy Giuliani doesn't fit the bill.
He should be all over TV offering his insights.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
He doesn’t need to be on the pundit list. He has a dedicated straight line to the Presidents Comm Center.
Rudy will serve if called.And he is a very close confident to the President whose effectiveness depends on Rudy keeping a low profile.
Rudy is on the President’s Cyber Security team. Rudy is one of a very few men who could actually pull off the special counsel duties because of all of his RICO experience in rolling up similar crime syndicates of the Italian mob.
As soon as I saw all the scathing public comments from various misfits and losers on the left regarding the firing of Andrew McCabe, I figured this was much bigger than just a case of a senior FBI guy being terminated for misconduct.
—
Yea. That’s a sure sign someone just poked a hornet’s nest. Or rat’s nest. Rats work better as an analogy.
Agree on all points.
He might already be doing it.
Sessions has said he has already appointed an outside prosecutor some time ago.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then why is Trey Gowdy calling for an appointment of a special independant counsel to work with the IG ?
If Sessions did so long ago, the fact that he has not revealed the identity of the man or woman can mean only one thing, that the appointee is another Obama weaponized hold over at DOJ ( which ticks of the President to no end.Sessions is a short timer. He won’t be there much longer because his recusal has made him so ineffective. Sessions has surrendered control of an Obama weaponized DOJ to the enemy.)
If this goes well, we enter a new era of history, and Trump becomes the second greatest president ever, right behind George Washington.
*********
From the article:
♦Lastly, where all this appears to be going. It is not likely there will be a ‘second special counsel’ per se’. With a prosecutor already working with Inspector General Horowitz that person already has a thorough knowledge of all the evidence. As soon as the IG publishes his report, the prosecutor can begin subpoenaing witnesses. It’s more than likely there’s already a Grand Jury seated somewhere hearing the criminal evidence he/she has carved out from the overwhelming IG evidence as collected.
You and I might be frustrated with the pace of the activity for a myriad of righteous reasons. However, we must also remind ourselves of the scale and scope of the corruption here that is inherent within the BIG PICTURE. All of this was done on purpose. None of this was accidental.
The prosecutor could, likely would, be having to outline the biggest political conspiracy in the history of politics. It is entirely possible officials within the CIA, NSA, DOJ, FBI, State Department, ODNI, and national security apparatus along with the Obama White House, Clinton campaign officials, politicians, career bureaucrats and possibly judges are all entwined and involved.
Add into this likelihood the complicit ideological media who will go absolutely bananas about any single member of their team being indicted; and a better than average chance the media will follow instructions from their leadership and send tens-of-thousands of low-info sycophants into the streets in protest, and well… you see the picture.
*********
____________
Hmmmm....
I have thought about posting over at CTH for years. I really haven't figured out how to do it. Do you know how.
I do find that generally their comments are wise and well informed.
I’ll keep saying it - this “special prosecutor/special counsel” is not constitutionally supportable and is convoluted conflict of interest by operation of what ever convoluted federal law created it.
The HOUSE is the ONLY body constitutionally assigned to impeach (formal charges) a high government official (US Const. Art. I, Sec. 2, Cl. 5). Thus, it should be the HOUSE that hires investigators and prosecutors for impeachment issues. If there is reasonable suspicion that FBI officials are corrupt, then the HOUSE should investigate and charge if/when probable cause is found. After impeachment, the Senate, which is the ONLY body constitutionally assigned to try impeachments (Art. I, Sec. 3, Cl. 6), should continue investigation if necessary.
If it’s for federal crimes done by lower government officials or those not currently in office, then the FBI/CIA should investigate and indict if probable cause is found. The first step is cleaning up the FBI’s own house.
_____________
WHAT does the HOUSE do when the FBI and others drag their feet for seven years or so to turn over documents........... and when they get them they are deeply redacted. WHAT?
The answer may have been the Congress at one time...... who knows what it is NOW? But it is not the Congress as now constituted.
Haven’t seen Rudy speaking for Trump since Rudy was overlooked for the job he wanted. Was it Sec of State? I think so. That was the last of Loyal Rudy supporting Trump. Trump made a BIG mistake when he dissed Rudy. His biggest so far. And what did Trump get for that decision? A Secretary of State who called him a moron and his most loyal spokesman nowhere to be found.
Gowdy?? Dear Lord, I hope NOT!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.