Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Readies Sweeping Tariffs and Investment Restrictions on China
NY Times ^ | 03-16-2018 | ANA SWANSON

Posted on 03/16/2018 12:12:00 PM PDT by NRx

WASHINGTON — The dust has yet to settle on President Trump’s decision to impose sweeping tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, but the White House is preparing another major trade measure, this time aimed squarely at China.

Mr. Trump and his top trade advisers are readying a raft of actions to penalize China’s theft of American intellectual property, including tariffs on at least $30 billion of annual Chinese imports, people familiar with the discussions said.

The measures, which could be announced as early as next week, may also include investment restrictions, caps on visas for Chinese researchers and challenges to China’s trade practices at the World Trade Organization. Those familiar with the planning cautioned that the timing could be delayed, and that such measures are likely to be introduced in stages.

The rapid pace of White House trade measures is no accident and comes at the president’s request. At a White House meeting last week, Robert Lighthizer, the United States trade representative, presented Mr. Trump with a plan to target $30 billion a year in Chinese imports.

That amount is equal to the cost that Mr. Lighthizer’s office estimates Chinese policies aimed at acquiring American technology impose on American companies annually. In August, Mr. Lighthizer officially began an investigation into those practices, which include digital warfare as well as requiring companies to hand over trade secrets and form joint ventures with Chinese partners to gain access to certain markets.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: china; trumptariffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: youngidiot
How would the tax cuts cause increased deficits? Tax cuts like the ones passed increase the funds coming into the treasury.

For a young idiot, you're pretty damned smart.

81 posted on 03/17/2018 10:31:19 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill
"It's always someone else's fault isn't it? I haven't noticed an objection on Trump's part to budget deficits. god forbid we just spend less."

I don't think you're understanding. The trade deficit is contributing to budget deficit. We need to put a stop to the idiotic and ruinous trade deficit with the Chinese communists that impacts wage earner incomes of American citizens. That'll will go a long way to reducing the budget deficit.

I could care less about Chinese communist jobs. I say let the trade war begin. And it's about time. There's more important things to consider than the availability of cheap communist Chinese produced electronics.

82 posted on 03/17/2018 12:28:27 PM PDT by User901
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: trublu
"It’s not all rosy for China. They have demographic issues in their not- too -distant future. Their senior citizen population is going to double within the next 10 -15 years. The gender gap already makes it difficult for marrying age males to find mates. They eased the one-child-policy, but there are still close to 120 males born for every 100 females. Single men without families just doesn’t work in their culture.

Well that is heartbreaking. I guess if the Chinese population gets up enough gumption to throw off their Marxist oppressors that will change. Not the problem of everyday American citizens. Our ancestors fought for freedom from government oppression thank God. Now it's up to us to protect that freedom for our descendants. And that should include not allowing obscene trade deficits with communist regimes. I'm behind Trump all the way on this issue.

83 posted on 03/17/2018 12:36:18 PM PDT by User901
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: User901
I don't think you're understanding.

A trade imbalance by itself doesn't create a money debt. The debt you mention in 16 comes from the budget deficit. If the government spends $100 in a year, but only takes in $90, the $10 difference is a budget deficit. When the government sells a bond to cover the deficit, a $10 debt is created. If the government reduced it's spending by $10 it would not need to create that debt.

A country can run a trade imbalance and create no debt.

84 posted on 03/17/2018 12:56:54 PM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Best President evah!


85 posted on 03/18/2018 6:53:21 AM PDT by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

A Canada that put a part time drama teacher in power? I use to have hope but I just think the populace is essentially socialist.


86 posted on 03/19/2018 1:51:07 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson