"Comparative advantage" today is being driven by the fact that developing countries don't incur the overhead production costs that developed countries do.
The most obvious examples of this are labor forces that operate in slave-like conditions (and sometimes outright forced labor), as well as the fact that industry in developing countries doesn't have to worry about containing their industrial waste (unlike us, Chinese industries just dump their toxic waste raw into rivers or onto the ground). Furthermore, the industries in many developing economies are state-subsidized. As a result, their steel and aluminum mills can afford to overproduce at cost or even at a loss thanks to government funding, and then dump that metal onto us to undermine US domestic production.
Is Boeing "state-subsidized" if they generate a lot of their revenue from U.S. defense contracts that aren't open to foreign bidders?
“and then dump that metal onto us to undermine US domestic production. “
Let’s not forget the advantage of currency pegging and devaluation.
As an example, China keep their currency pegged to the dollar at a rate that is estimated to be 35-40% below what it would be if it was free floating.
That’s a HUGE artificial advantage.
So, we have Comparative Advantage, Absolute Advantage and Artificial Advantage...something the classical economists never even considered. In their era, gold and silver were absolutes.
We again find ourselves in a Mercantilist world, with every country seeking advantage over the other. And ALL seeking the largest and richest market in the world.
And the USA has unilaterally disarmed while being picked clean.
It’s the largest transfer of capital stock in the history of man, and committed Free Traders refuse to see it.
overhead production, regulatory and environmental costs.