Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CatOwner

American Thinker recently had a piece about how Sessions seeming lethargy at DOJ is a calculated strategy by him and Trump (along with Trump’s Tweets attacking Sessions) to distance Sessions from Trump’s image with Democrats, so that when Sessions brings the hammer down on people like McCabe, or even Clinton, he will seem independent.

Take if with a grain of salt....


8 posted on 03/02/2018 3:34:48 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: PGR88

I’m completely over that “super secret slight-of-hand 4-D invisible chess distract the enemy” fairy tale.

Newt had it right: Sessions wanted the title, but not the job.


30 posted on 03/02/2018 4:31:21 PM PST by clintonh8r (Truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88

I too read Lifsons wishful thinking article. He is not quite as bad as the totally delusional posters at Conservative treehouse who actually insist that sessions has 13000 indictments already done and ready to reveal. I tell you some of these sessions defenders are so delusional as to be borderline mentally ill.


50 posted on 03/02/2018 5:53:24 PM PST by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88

“American Thinker recently had a piece about how Sessions seeming lethargy at DOJ is a calculated strategy by him and Trump (along with Trump’s Tweets attacking Sessions) to distance Sessions from Trump’s image with Democrats, so that when Sessions brings the hammer down on people like McCabe, or even Clinton, he will seem independent.

Take it with a grain of salt.... “


I have yet to find one person who believes that there’s some grand plot between President Trump and Jeff Sessions to eventually bring the hammer down on the Deep State, that can tell me WHY such a conniving administration of justice would be necessary in the first place.

Every president has a Justice Department and an AG that he is expecting to carry out what concerns him.

Why does President Trump have to act as though he had never met Jeff Sessions?

It makes no sense to me whatsoever.


55 posted on 03/02/2018 6:25:41 PM PST by Southnsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88

Take it with...The Great Salt Lake...perhaps?

Out there they certainly believe some things that make more sense than all this hypergalactic, Sun Tzu, Master of Strategy folderol that’s been circulating about Sessions.

Guy needs to $#!t or get off the pot.


60 posted on 03/03/2018 1:31:40 AM PST by HKMk23 (You ask how to fight an idea? Well, I'll tell you how: with another idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88

Boy! Is that a stretch! Let’s have a contest to see who can come up with the most absurd excuse for Sessions being a spineless slacker and Trump having the worst case of misplaced loyalty possible for not firing and replacing Sessions.


79 posted on 03/03/2018 8:03:57 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88

Since they say part of the “strategy” is Trump & Sessions being so stealthily in control that everything has Trump’s approval (it would have to under their theory), then I hope the American Thinker can explain a couple of things that need some ‘splainin...

*If Trump is puppet mastering his whole Exec Branch, then why did he approve Mueller’s appointment (again, if he’s puppet mastering this would have to be included because NOTHING happens in the Executive Branch without his knowledge)? Because of Mueller, Trump (and Kushner) have had to hire a battery of expensive lawyers to deal with all of the Mueller (and his hired team of Democrat Donors) demands for documents and witnesses - at hugely expensive lawyer fees. Or is this also part of Trumps grand scheme: to burn his own money at thou$ands a day for lawyers he doesn’t need?? After all, if Mueller is a Trump White Hat stealthily working for Trump & Sessions’ Master Plan, why does Trump have all the the expensive lawyers working for him?. So...this money burning is all for the sake of keeping up a smoky-glass concealment??

*Since Devin Nunes pointed out in his letter to Sessions March 1st there are statutes violated in the FISC abuse process, then what are we to make of the fact Rod Rosenstein was actually one of the signers of the last FISC application to extend the existing spy warrant on Trump, and signed right about the exact time Mueller was appointed? If there are cases to be made that those who signed the application to the FISC using the now clearly fake “dossier” defrauded the court and thereby committed crimes (Comey, Lynch, McCabe and Yates), then isn’t Rosenstein also as guilty of the same felonies Nunes points out in his March 1st letter? This is the same Rosenstein whom Sessions cannot praise enough every time he gets in front of a microphone or camera. So, if the American Thinker claims Trump 7 Sessions are executing a plan, then it has to include Mueller’s presence and Rosenstein’s signing off on a court application that was apparently a criminal act. (This explains why Rosenstein was begging Paul Ryan to stop the Nunes memo’s release, citing “grave concerns” over the information in it regarding accuracy).

So yeah, let’s have the tidying up on why Trump and Sessions designed a Master Plan to: hire Mueller, which produced huge legal expenses and possible legal jeopardy for both Trump and his son-in-law; why Trump and Sessions allow Rosenstein to stay in his job when he’s apparently committed a felony; and why Sessions basically tells Nunes to pound sand regarding his March 1st letter - he’ll have the toothless, slowpoke IG take 18 months to look into it and he’ll think about it after that. We must remember: Nunes and other committee chairs are not exactly fans of Rosenstein - who stiffed Congressional subpoenas for documents as long as 8 months, and only turned them over when threatened with contempt of Congress. Was that part of the Trump - Sessions plan too - stiffing the legislative branch from their constitutional authority? I’ll wait...


103 posted on 03/04/2018 7:16:44 AM PST by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson