Posted on 03/02/2018 3:26:17 PM PST by davikkm
The Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes (R-CA), is asking Attorney General Jeff Sessions whether the Justice Department is investigating what appears to be a clear violation of FBI protocols. In a letter sent on Thursday, Nunes laid out the protocols that FBI agents appear to have violated in using the Steele dossier to obtain a surveillance warrant on a Trump campaign member under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
He cited FBI guidelines that officials must follow when requesting FISA warrants, including that Only document and verified information may be used to support FBI applications [FISA] to the court [FISC].
Nunes said in his letter that former and current DOJ and FBI leadership have confirmed to the Committee that unverified information from the Steele dossier comprised an essential part of the FISA applications related to Carter Page.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
....Or on Hillary, the server, 30,000 emails, etc etc.
When Sessions vanishes from the scene for a week or two, I always figure he’s working on something big.
Then I see him at lunch with Rosenstein...........
Sure wish Trey Gowdy would be made AG.
As I was reading this article (As D.C. Corruption Mounts, Heres How The American People Can Get Justice), I was beginning to think of a solution that was close to where the author ended up.
What if the FBI were disbanded as a federal agency, and replaced by a different organization that was populated by the states themselves? Each state would delegate a number of investigators to serve at the pleasure of their home state, and this body would become a federal investigative bureau.
As is with the militia, the Constitution provides for calling up the militias for national service, but the officers are selected by the states. It might not be a stretch to declare that state militias have investigators as a component of a military police, and then use the militia clause in the Constitution to call up the state militias' investigative arms for federal service, with state appointed officers.
Each state can create a branch of their militia as MPs, or detectives. These people would report to militia officers appointed within each state, and then these militia branches (officers and detectives) would be called up at the request the Commander-In-Chief and approval by Congress (Article I Section 8: "to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions,") to serve a national priority such as investigating a particular federal crime, under the authority of state officers, not federal bureaucrats. The state officers will report directly to the Commander-In-Chief (Article II Section II: "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States"). Once the investigation is complete, the investigating team is released back to the states. If a crime occurred in one state, then the militia police from another state can be called up to investigate. Several investigations across several states can operate in parallel, if needed.
I have done process reviews and root cause analyses in my past, and what we look for are systemic causes of failures, not behavioral causes. Part of that review is identifying the protective systems that were in place to prevent what happened from happening, and to brainstorm additional protective systems to catch whatever still slipped through.
Lax management enforcement of process compliance might be a systemic cause if the fix were to reinforce the importance of process compliance and put consequences on management for lack of process discipline. However, in the recent examples of FBI failure, management was not lax in oversight, they were also complicit actors in avoiding the process. This is still behavioral, so the systemic root cause is not yet found.
I'm going to suggest that the systemic root cause of the recent FBI disfunction is the "independent" nature of the FBI itself. This was magnified by the behavioral causes that top management felt they were unaccountable to anyone, and that a single ideological mindset became established through years of political appointments that controlled the hiring practices of lower-level staff. Using management reinforcement to correct the root cause is ineffective given that management is a part of the problem. Therefore, we must look to other protective systems for corrections.
One protective system is the Inspector General. While this seems to be working now, in hindsight it doesn't seem to have been effective at the time the actions were taking place. When the bad actors are the top management itself in a department, an IG is too easily bypassed. Therefore, a new protective system must be put in place.
My proposed corrective system is to replace a federal-centric FBI with a state-centric investigative agency. This agency would have distributed leadership, since by following the militia model in the Constitution, the "officers" would be selected by the states and would be subject to recall at the whim of the home state. A single monolithic mindset cannot become entrenched, since concerned states can replace their officers at any time.
I suggested attaching this investigative militia to the Commander-In-Chief directly on a case-by-case basis, with some provision for a senior officer hierarchy to manage separate state contingents. Since Congress has the authority to call up the militia, but the President is the Commander-In-Chief of the militia, there is a check-and-balance already in place. If a state investigative team finds evidence of a crime, the President can refer charges to the Department of Justice for further prosecutorial action.
-PJ
I think you are thinking of them moving the Secret Service from Treasury to Homeland Security.
That photo will live in infamy.
Even if Sessions IS “investigating” about the critical issues you’ve detailed, the Deep State DOJ people who are doing the leg work are dragging it out, JUST LIKE how the Senate is dragging out approving DJT’s nominations.
They figure every day they delay is one less day their enemy has to do them damage.... until they regain control.
In 247 more days, if patriots do well on the midterm elections on November 6, 2018, President Trump can feel free to give him the boot.
January 2, 2019 is the date newly elected U.S. Congressmen get sworn in. 304 more days.
Then we will finally know if there really is a brilliant Trump-Sessions behind the scenes Get’em Plan, or if the Keebler Elf is who many think he is.
That really surprised me bc he talks like a lawyer, but sure enough, he is a California farm boy with a degree in Agriculture!
I agree with those who say Sessions should go, but far better to replace him with somebody outside DC. No more swamp rat surprises, please!
Anyone explain why the hell is Clinton not under investigation, and why Jarrett, Rice, Obama Comey etc are still not under investigation?
and still Clinton has not been investigated
Maybe states should ignore the homo marriage crap since CA thinks it can do what ever the hell it wants.
Looks like, despite several poster’s snide remarks about California, a Californian is leading the way to expose and eradicate government corruption. We need more like him both here in California and throughout the nation.
And no I haven’t forgot about that pencil neck from Burbank, an émigré. Adam Schiff.....
Deep State has something on him.. Just like they had something on CSCJ Roberts.
The FBI should be abolished.. We have too many damn redundant agencies.
Exactly..no one but snake in the grass Sessions knew all along he would recuse himself.
Those letters set in motion the investigation that is the reason that we learned the names Strzok, Page, Ohr, McCabe. The IG staff conducts investigations and then publicly reports its findings to the DOJ and the House oversight committees. It’s the evidence that everyone is waiting for, what is needed for filing charges. Both Sessions and the House can prosecute, the House via a special counsel. Sessions has been able to follow this investigation since the day he took office. He is not recused from this one. The IG investigation started before Trump took office and no one seems to have noticed for 11 months until we first heard of Strzok etc. No leaks.
THAT;S IT!! Thanks!
It is looking more and more like the left has something on Attorney General Jeff Sessions. The fix is in and everyone knows it.
Sessions is modernity’s, Benedict Arnold.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.